• Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Damn i hate that word so much. What are they supposed to influence? They are advertiser, period. Influencer should be reserve for someone who actually contribute to the society, not some clown on tiktok/insta doing memes and jokes.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They are called “influencers” because the ghouls that work in marketing realised that they are an extremely effective tool for their ongoing psychological warfare arms race

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s so strange to hear people calling themselves an influencer, like they’re bragging about their ability to psychologically manipulate people (whether to sell the shit they’re being paid to pretend to like, or just for good old power tripping)

      • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s why i hate that word so much. “I am/want to be an influencer” is such a weird phrase but it’s an acceptable phrase for a lot of them. What do you trying to influence people with? Science? Math? Arts? Creativity? But no, it’s purchasing choice.

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d say you have that backwards

      Influencer is the word companies use for people with a following, and therefore power over peoples buying decisions.

      For some reason it’s leaked and been misappropriated.

      If you actually make something of value you are whatever that thing is, AND a potential influencer of buying decisions.

    • ErinCrush@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What I really hate is when actual content creators get lumped in with that name.

  • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    My impression of the main microblogging sites has been:

    Twitter: musk fanboys, celebrities and people who can’t/won’t switch

    Threads: conservatives, alt-right, grifters and celebrities

    Truth social: conspiracy nuts, maggots, alt-right

    Mastodon/kbin: nerds, left-wingers and furries

    Bluesky: furries, left-wingers and people who liked pre-musk Twitter

  • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Completely agree. Use the nuclear option immediately to defend the fediverse from the sociopathic transnational corporation Meta.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t say that around here. You’ll get a thousand sycophants down your throat bleating “It’S ThE uSeR’s ChOiCe!!!” and that you’re “against free speech” and “just as bad as Meta” if you want us to disconnect from them.

      I’m with you, though. Meta is evil and we should not be doing business with them in any way. Any user who wants to make the “choice” to do business with Meta can do it using one of Meta’s many own products instead.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Idk, man. If you look at countries currently experiencing lots of public uprisings and revolutionary organizing, they seem to be the ones with some of the least prolific digital media. Myanmar, northern India, and rural Bolivia all have terrible wifi.

      Folks in “modern” nations like South Korea and Dubai and the UK are increasingly these NEET hermits with no friends or romantic partners or sense of collective good will who just fixate on online phantasm celebrities. Occasionally, one of them pops off and tries to murder a politician. But that’s not revolutionary conduct.

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Seems like it’s easier to divide people who arr using social media.

        If they don’t have social media, they might go make friends, and those friends might have the same problems, and might seek to solve them…

  • psud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Won’t it be more fun to downvote anything posted or connected by a user @threads?

  • Calavera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, micro blogs shouldn’t really exist, neither instagram or Facebook, or tiktok… Just turn-off the internet please

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its funny that people here think they’re that much different than a threads user. They probably all use Instagram or Facebook.

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lemmy users are more akin to reddit\forums\image boards users.

      It’s not really better, it’s just significantly different.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Been here as long as you have been and one thing i can be certain is, if one of those influencer is here they will be drown in spit. And downvote. Mostly downvote.