I find that i can spot AI Images fairly easily these days, especially the sort of fantastical tableaus that get posted to the various AI communities around lemmy. I’m tired of seeing them; it all looks the same to me. Was wondering if im being too sensitive, or if other people are similarly bored of the constant unimaginative AI spam…

For the record, I block any explicit AI Art communities that pop up in the feed, but there are more every day…

  • Alexc@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t consider it art. The only “creative” part is the prompt itself. Even then, it’s really just users trying to be as fanciful (or perverted) as possible. Once the prompt is ingested, the code takes its cues to remix the turgid crap that’s called the internet today.

    Yes, once in a while it produces something “interesting” but this is an accident and not the desired outcome. Ask any artist about this - I’ve never met any that consider all their work as “good” (Ahem, Damien Hirst) and purposefully filter their own output. Ask AI to do that. It can’t. It will literally continue to shit things out until you ask it to stop. Again, like Damien Hirst…

    The downside is it’s cheap and requires literally no skill. This means that soon, it will be pretty much everywhere, and thus we’ll continue the inexorable slide into abject mediocrity.

    I’m not scared of the AI uprising. I’m scared it’s going to bore us all to death.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think you’re being unfairly dismissive of the amount of work and creativity that goes into using an AI art generator well. Sure, you can just slam down a prompt and post whatever comes up. But if you really want to generate something specific it can be a ton of work. It can also involve plenty of fiddling with traditional art tools (funny that Photoshop and such are considered “traditional” now, once upon a time it was Photoshop’s turn on the “not real art!” Firing line). Some of the most egregious moral panics lately have come from work where 90% of the effort was traditional tooling, with just a dab of AI in the mix.

      But it all gets lumped together under “LOL bad fingers!” And demonized.

      • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        But if you really want to generate something specific it can be a ton of work

        How much work involved compared to digital art started from a blank page?

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          Less.

          But then, the same is true of digital art itself relative to that done on traditional media, or of photography compared to portrait painting, both technologies that were at one point new.

      • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Still orders of magnitude less effort than actually learning to draw for yourself and making something actually creative

        But please do go on about how your pink slime regurgitated by an LLM trained on stolen artwork scraped from hundreds of thousands of actual artists requires so much effort and creativity

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          But please do go on about how your pink slime regurgitated by an LLM trained on stolen artwork scraped from hundreds of thousands of actual artists requires so much effort and creativity

          Because clearly you’re so open to reason.

          • Knitwear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Clearly you’re not open to facts. You may not like their tone but is any of it untrue?

            I get that it must feel uncomfortable to be faced with the concept of consequences when you’re having fun, but for someone who’s into art you sure seem to hate artists

          • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            I mean, I’m not the one who had the unmitigated gall and sense of entitlement to compare the thousands of hours each of the tens of thousands of artists (whose artwork was scraped by LLMs without so much as a by-your-leave) spent practicing to get good at artwork to the… what, ten? twenty? hours you took to get good at “prompt engineering.” Nor did I have the absolute nerve to then complain about how you have it SO ROUGH because you have to “fiddle with Photoshop” but all the mean people mock all your hard effort!

            Hint: You’re being mocked because you deserve to be mocked. At best, AI “artists” like yourself are lazily piggybacking off the literal millions of collective man-hours of labor that actual artists spent honing their talent, and trying to pass off the creative equivalent of a boneless chicken nugget shaped like a dinosaur as being of worthy of the same respect as a beef wellington, or at least a damn good burger.

      • Alexc@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Really good counterpoint, and you are correct, that I don’t know enough about it. I suspect that, like most things, there will emerge some real “power users” - the artists if you will. I think the problem that started this thread is that, currently, you see AI generated art everywhere and I do agree with that. Then again, maybe they said this about Cave art in antediluvian times…