fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 年前Magic πmander.xyzimagemessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up1712arrow-down17
arrow-up1705arrow-down1imageMagic πmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 年前message-square60fedilink
minus-squarenova_ad_vitum@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·2 年前Honestly probably not that many more. My guess since I’m too lazy to do the math is less than 100.
minus-squareEvilHankVenture@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·2 年前The diameter of a hydrogen atom is over 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 plank lengths. So based on this post I have no idea.
minus-squarexthexder@l.sw0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·edit-22 年前Well that’s only 26 more digits, so we’re probably good at 100 digits of pi. [citation needed]
minus-squarerasensprenger@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·2 年前log_10(size of observable universe / planck length) = 61.74… so like 63 digits of precision for everything are enough
minus-squareMalgas@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·2 年前The width of a hydrogen atom is 3.1*10^24 Planck lengths. So, yeah, 65 digits of pi ought to do it.
Honestly probably not that many more. My guess since I’m too lazy to do the math is less than 100.
The diameter of a hydrogen atom is over 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 plank lengths.
So based on this post I have no idea.
Well that’s only 26 more digits, so we’re probably good at 100 digits of pi. [citation needed]
log_10(size of observable universe / planck length) = 61.74… so like 63 digits of precision for everything are enough
The width of a hydrogen atom is 3.1*10^24 Planck lengths. So, yeah, 65 digits of pi ought to do it.