• Flori@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    228
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Your friendly reminder that the Brave CEO is Mozillas old CEO, who was fired from Mozilla for being unapologetically homophobic.

    • Rose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Worse than merely being homophobic, as he financially supported politicians and causes that worked to prevent equal rights.

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        technical issues

        Well technically the CEO would have an issue with you if you were gay

        Lmao

        • AnonTwo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          34
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean it’s derailed the entire thread so pretty much nobody is talking about the removed feature anymore.

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            34
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Are you seriously complaining about different comment threads within a post? That is literally how this works. Anybody who wants to talk about the feature is welcome to. You are not restricted to one thread at a time.

            Be real, you just don’t like the critique of brave.

            • AnonTwo@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              23
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I mean, it’s more like I wanted to see more discussion about brave. It’s not even like it’s talking about things the CEO specifically did to the browser, it’s just talking about the CEO.

              And yeah I’m complaining about different threads in a post, when 3 comments are about the browser and like 15 are about the CEO.

              If you have something to say negative about brave from this feature, that’s cool, but I’m not seeing it.

              • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                18
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                You are spending more time than anybody discussing this. The person wrote one short comment and here you are going back and forth still. If you want to talk about the removed feature then talk about the removed feature! Nobody stopping you my dude

                • beardown@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If you’re a real person then you’re very unlikable and antisocial

                  If you’re a shill against Brave then you’re bad at your job. I’m going to check Brave out now because of your offensive and unlikable behavior

              • Umbrias@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                1 year ago

                “People want to talk about the things they care about when they should be talking about the things I care about!”

        • dime@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Please don’t tell me you wear adidas (founded by a Nazi), or drive a Ford (made by an antisemite), or listen to Wagner, (a racist), or drive a Volkswagen, or play Minecraft, or use wix, or eat at Chick-fil-A, or…etc etc

          • Flori@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t. But “originally made by” and “currently being run by” are, in my opinion, two different things

        • AnonTwo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Wait why are you on the privacy community when you don’t care about the parts that are specifically related to privacy?

            • AnonTwo@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Uhhh…that’s not a meme, as the other guy said it’s virtue signalling. I don’t even know why you would fallback on it being a meme since people generally agreed with what you said.

              If anything I think that makes you sound like an ass but that’s just me.

          • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            31
            ·
            1 year ago

            For those oh so super valuable virtue signal points, as if most of the services and products they use weren’t created with slave labor and run by people who’ve done far worse

    • Engywuck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      111
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He wasn’t fired. He voluntarily left. And thus Mozilla is left with an incompetent CEO whose only aim is to increase her paycheck year after year, despite pathetic market share results for FF. Enjoy that.

      That said, nobody cares about your “friendly remainders”. We’re talking about software here, not politics.

      And, to stay on topic, yes, it happened to me that Strict FP broke some website, in particular those displaying a frame with a map or similar stuff. So I’ve resorted to use “standard” FP myself.

      • AtmaJnana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        93
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        nobody cares about your “friendly remainders”. We’re talking about software here, not politics.

        Nah. I care. You dont speak for me. I cant tell if you’re a shill for Brave or a MAGAt or both.

        • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          52
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wow. The internet must be really rough for you if people don’t wear labels so you know who to hate before learning a damn thing about them!

          • LWD@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, it’s terrible when an entire group of people are discriminated against for a label.

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          58
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not a shill for Brave. It has its fair share of technical issues but it’s the less worse browser for my use case (better than FF, anyway). Your (or mine) opinion on the CEO has nothing to do with the technical issue discussed in OP’s link.

          And no, what MAGA are you talking about? I’m not even 'murican. Take your meds, dude.

        • AnonTwo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          54
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, you can grandstand all you want while you have no platforms to safely do it on. Pretty sure having working products for privacy is more important to activism than one guy being an asshole.

      • Umbrias@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Technology and ethics and politics are not airgapped magically distinct things. Pretending that they are is a strategic political choice you are actively making.

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok. I’m a bad person because I enjoy using a given browser. I get that.

          Another one that goes on my ignore list. Bye.

          • Umbrias@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If that’s what you feel is the case if you don’t separate politics from technology then that sounds like a personal problem to address.

            • Engywuck@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The point is that pretending there is no connection when there is clearly a huge relevance here is massive.

              In the imagination of upvotes-hungry virtue-signaling people, of course.

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you hate the Brave CEO for doing the same thing as the Mozilla CEO, but with even less restraint?

        Or are you just whining in hopes that nobody will question whether you’re being a hypocrite

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yawn… I’m tired of this shit. You people are really ridiculous. I’m going to just block you. Enjoy your cognitive dissonance and your virtue signaling.

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          What is beyond my understanding is why every fucking time someone posts some relevant TECHNICAL info or question about that browser there’s always someone else, which appears to be less smart than an amoeba, that feels the need to write the same exaggerate and OT bullshit about the CEO.