• Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is such a dumb myth. The problem is that we refuse to embrace green energy, not that there’s too many people.

    If the oil lobby didn’t block all progress this would have been solved long ago.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        A few top% people in the world (mostly western countries) are responsible for the majority of emissions

        We throw away a billion more times food than we really consume too. And we just dump everything we don’t like into the ocean

        Everything is a distribution problem, not an availability problem.

        • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The problem is that the amount of population doesn’t match the way we live. You could create any ideal society and say that overpopulation isn’t the issue, or create an underpopulated society and say the way we live isn’t the issue.

          You’re saying “we just need to fix the biggest issues of our society in in order for overpopulation to be a non-issue, easy!”

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I’m saying we would screw up the earth even if we literally had 1/2 the people. By just dumping even more in the ocean and being even less responsible.

            We have an absolute abundance of resources and energy and somehow (oil lobby) we manage to be so inefficient that we will never improve that efficiency unless absolutely needed.

            If we had half the humans we would waste twice as much.