Tixanou@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 10 months agocoding chesslemmy.worldimagemessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1693arrow-down126
arrow-up1667arrow-down1imagecoding chesslemmy.worldTixanou@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 10 months agomessage-square40fedilink
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up38·10 months agoThat has a finite number of moves. And then you could possibly generate the code based on that finite set.
minus-squareShard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up40·10 months agoChess technically has a finite number of moves. Although its a huge number and some have theorized its larger than the number of atoms in the known universe.
minus-squareAlbbi@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down4·10 months agoTechnically it’s infinite, but that’s because of a stalemate. You can keep repeating the same moves over and over.
minus-squareeatham 🇭🇲@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·10 months agoStalemate is after 3 repeat moves, so no.
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·10 months agoBut it’s a state machine, and you could easily contrive scenarios for infinite moves, without stalemate.
minus-squareScubus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·10 months ago*finite, I’m assuming autocorrect gotcha
That has a finite number of moves. And then you could possibly generate the code based on that finite set.
Chess technically has a finite number of moves. Although its a huge number and some have theorized its larger than the number of atoms in the known universe.
Technically it’s infinite, but that’s because of a stalemate. You can keep repeating the same moves over and over.
Stalemate is after 3 repeat moves, so no.
But it’s a state machine, and you could easily contrive scenarios for infinite moves, without stalemate.
*finite, I’m assuming autocorrect gotcha