• BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Signal were fools to remove the SMS support from their app. That was a good way to get people in to use the system - they could have insecure SMS chats with those not on signal, and secure signal chats with those on it. The app would warn you when someone didn’t have signal and the chat was insecure.

    It was a really good “trojan horse” route into people’s lives. I was using signal every day and it was easier encouraging others to make the switch because it was a convenient app.

    Then the devs removed that and dumped all their users back onto other SMS apps.

    Now I have 3 apps - an SMS app, Signal and WhatsApp. I barely ever use Signal now. I want to use it more but so few people I know use it, and it’s not the first place people message me from.

    Removing SMS support was a huge strategic misstep. They should have been the bridge for people to move from SMS to secure chat.

    • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      While I do think you are correct, you have to remember a few things:

      1. SMS really isn’t used outside the US (and iMessage pretty much was the death of text messages and now iMessage also supports RCS)
      2. Open source projects can be strict about following a moral code
      3. Anything more than just sending secure messages is just an attack vector and more layers of code to maintain