• Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I heard this a lot. The reality is, if hamas surrender now, they will still be out there looking for hamas, because no one know how many hamas is out there, who is the hamas, or when will hamas strike.

      • cıτızεnsεяıous@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        You might be right, but to some degree that also means that hamas brought this over their own people.

        The nazis in Germany for example did the same, and whole citys where bombed by the allies. So would you blame the nazis or the allies for this? I think there where a lot of war crimes on both sides back then, nevertheless it started because of the cruelties of Hitlerers entourage. And the German people did not fight this régime which made them accomplices at least according to historians.

        This does not mean that I support how the IDF operates. The hole thing that got us in this situation this time is because the hamas attacked civilians in an monstrously way and did this over years with their missiles as far as I can tell. So I would blame them at first also the palestinians should have fought hamas their selfs.

        But maybe I am wrong, so I am listening.

        • phreekno@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          hamas brought this over their own people

          This started in 1917. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration

          Then there was Nakba in 1948. Literally catastrophe. https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/nakba-palestine-catastrophe-explained

          Hamas was founded in 1988 and revised their charter in 2017. https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/hamas-2017-document-full

          nazis in Germany for example did the same

          Comparing a resistance movement against a colonizing occupier to the actions that two industrialized nations took against each other during wartime is not really the best way to frame this. If we look at the colonial expansion of the United States against the Native tribes and collectives that were already here, that had established their own system of governing based on mutual collaboration, it gives us a better perspective and context.

        • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think it’s fair to blame Israel for their excessive violence, in the same way it’s fair to blame the Allies for flattening civilian cities at the end of the war.

          When it came to bombings, both sides were terrible. A lot of things the victors of WW2 would’ve been war crimes if it weren’t for the blanket “all Germans were nazis, all nazis were evil, so they deserved it” attitude that developed during the war. But who would defend the nazis? They had invaded every country around them, which turned everyone in their sphere of influence into either their enemies or their liberated subjects. Switzerland could wag a finger at the victors, but there weren’t many places in the world that could add anything.

          I don’t know if historians would call the German people accomplices, but the media and general public sure did, and that’s what stuck around. Real life is a lot more complicated than “group A bad, group B good”. Hitler didn’t come to power democratically, he was a minor player that used threats and violence to seize control.

          There are a lot of similarities between the beginning of the second world war and the current destruction of Gaza. Everyone feels bad for the Palestinians but nobody wants the Palestinians to come to them. Invaders haven’t spoken their intent to commit genocide out loud yet, but everyone can see where this is going. There is a clear imbalance in military strength, and out of fear of escalation, nobody is willing to do anything. There’s also a second war raging that has powerful allies worried much more.

          But there are also differences; Israel isn’t going to try to conquer the Middle East, the colonial powers are no longer controlling the vast majority of the world so the political situation is more complex. The Palestinians are much more concentrated in one single place, and the conflict has not only an ethnical history, but also a territorial one, going back hundreds to thousands of years, with both sides picking an arbitrary point in history to claim their right to the land. Then there’s the cold war-style military backing of Hamas and the IDF by Iran and the USA and its allies. It also doesn’t help that both sides are fighting to drive the others out of their lands; if Israel would stop their invasion and attempt to rebuild Gaza into a paradise, many Gazans will still cry for the death of all Jews in ten years time.

          The Israel/Palestine situation isn’t as simple and clean as any world war. It has festered for much longer. Barring the eradication of all Jews, I doubt we’ll see peace in the middle east in our lifetimes with the way things are going.

        • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          You know, i don’t really wanna engage with these “they brought it upon themselves” argument, because it’s really just gonna spiral down into endless back and forth where the origin is only remotely resemble the issue today. To say palestinian deserve what they get because of Hamas is like saying Israeli deserve what they get because of Netanyahu.

            • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              You didn’t explicitly say “deserving”, you’re implying. Heavily. There’s no strawman.

              Isolating this situation in such a narrow timeline doesn’t make it better either, it’s a very complex issue that need to have a clear separation between modern conflict and past. Which is why I don’t want to engage in discussing, people will either only isolate the whole situation to the current conflict or be very quickly point out the ancient history.

              • cıτızεnsεяıous@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                I think I never had to qoute myself, but what does “hamas brought this over their own people” tell you else then that which is writen? I only am responsible for what I am writing but not for what another one feels the words could mean.

                Your next point is valid though.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      When Lebanon laid down their arms and surrendered with security guarantee from the US that they wold not be harmed, israel committed mass rape and Genocide. This is also where they stole the “pregnant women with the baby ripped out” story from. Israel actually did that themselves:

      Sabra and Shatila massacre

      Janet Lee Stevens, an American journalist, later wrote to her husband, Dr. Franklin Lamb, “I saw dead women in their houses with their skirts up to their waists and their legs spread apart; dozens of young men shot after being lined up against an alley wall; children with their throats slit, a pregnant woman with her stomach chopped open, her eyes still wide open, her blackened face silently screaming in horror; countless babies and toddlers who had been stabbed or ripped apart and who had been thrown into garbage piles.”

      • cıτızεnsεяıous@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        “(…)It was perpetrated by the Lebanese Forces The killings are widely believed to have taken place under the command of Lebanese politician Elie Hobeika, whose family and fiancée had been murdered by Palestinian militants and left-wing Lebanese militias during the Damour massacre in 1976, itself a response to the Karantina massacre(…)”

        “(…)The primary responsibility for the massacre is generally attributed to Elie Hobeika. Robert Maroun Hatem, Elie Hobeika’s bodyguard, stated in his book From Israel to Damascus that Hobeika ordered the massacre of civilians in defiance of Israeli instructions to behave like a “dignified” army.(…)”

        This never stops does it?

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          https://www.hrw.org/news/2001/06/22/israel-sharon-investigation-urged

          As Defense Minister, Ariel Sharon had overall responsibility over the Israeli Defense Forces and allowed Phalangist militias to enter the camps where they terrorized the residents for three days.

          During the BBC program, Morris Draper, the U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East at the time, said that U.S. officials were horrified when told Sharon had allowed Phalange militias into West Beirut and the camps “because it would be a massacre.” He told the BBC that after the killings began he cabled Defense Minister Sharon, telling him, “You must stop the slaughter…. The situation is absolutely appalling. They are killing children. You have the field completely under your control and are therefore responsible for that area.”

          Lebanese israel-backed anti-Palestinian Fascists which were pointed to the camp by israel, armed with weapons. The IDF knew very well they would commit that massacare, the IDF which surrounded the camp made sure to defend the Phalangist militias while they commited their massacare.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              The Kahan Commission (named after the President of the Israeli Supreme Court) that investigated the massacre in 1983 concluded that “Minister of Defense [Sharon] bears personal responsibility” and should “draw the appropriate personal conclusions arising out of the defects revealed with regard to the manner in which he discharged the duties of his office.” The commission recommended that Prime Minister Menachem Begin remove Sharon from office if he did not resign. Sharon did resign as minister of defense, though he subsequently assumed other cabinet positions. Annexes of the commission report have not yet been made public, and it is not known if they contain additional information specific to Sharon´s involvement.

              By all accounts, the perpetrators of this indiscriminate slaughter were members of the Phalange (or Kata´eb, in Arabic) militia, a Lebanese force that was armed by and closely allied to Israel since the outbreak of Lebanon´s civil war in 1975. It must be noted, however, that the killings were carried out in an area under IDF control. An IDF forward command post was situated on the roof of a multi-story building located some 200 meters southwest of the Shatilla camp.

              I guess these people can’t read either because if it’s israels responsibility that sure sounds like israel did it.

              Maybe you can send the Human Rights Watch a message to correct them. Be sure to link your wikipedia quote.

              • cıτızεnsεяıous@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                I was not the one whow brought up this topic or the sources. I qouted your own source so you could understand that you can not just copie some pieces out of an complex topic to underline your point. This topic is a good example in which you can see that you can not blaime only one person or instant. We could do a source fight with cruelties of every party, but that helpes noebody. But I think it would help (at least not harm anyone) if hamas (which is a terrorist group) would lay their arms down.

                • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  And I think it would help (at least not harm anyone) if israel (which is a Nazi ethostate) would lay their arms down.

                  Hey you know what they could do to solve this? A permanent ceasefire! Which Hamas agree to (wow)!

                  Guess who doesn’t?

                  • cıτızεnsεяıous@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    Do you really think they wanted a ceasefire out of humanitarian reasons? Come on…

                    You can not attack someone and if they strike back, you want a ceasefire.

                    Oh, and there was a ceasefire just before hamas attacked civilians with AK47.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ah, yes, and Israel will just continue their occupation and genocide of Gaza indefinitely. There’s a reason Hamas exists you moron.