• fiercekitten@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The one and only time I bought into a project on Indiegogo was for a phone that said it was shipping that month, even though the company had been delaying it for a year already (unbeknownst to me) and they had no idea when they were going to finish. It was straight up fraud, Indiegogo let the company do it without consequence, and 2.5 years later the project is still up on Indiegogo. Now I’m out $800, and the asshole company is still claiming they’ll send all the backers their phones any day now. They’ve been literally saying it for years.

      Don’t learn the hard way like I had to. Never back an Indiegogo project.

        • fiercekitten@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I am not certain of the differences between Kickstarter and Indiegogo. You’re right that there’s no guarantee that you’ll get the items you backed, but in my case, the company making the phone was straight up lying about their progress and release schedule, and not just having poor judgment about timelines, but actually committing fraud, and Indiegogo took no action against them when hundreds of backers brought it to their attention.

    • n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Is there something in particular about Indiegogo that I missed, or are you just pointing out it’s crowd funded? (and that means you could lose your money without anything in return)

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I’m not disinterested, though $350 is a little steep ($450 if you’re not an ‘early bird’). Ideally it would be bootloader unlockable and rootable as well. I would probably use it like a PDA of old.

    https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/the-minimal-phone-first-e-ink-qwerty-phone#/

    Preliminary Specs:

    • CPU: MTK 6769
    • RAM: 4GB
    • Storage: 128GB
    • OS: Android 13
    • Display: 3.5” E-Ink Touch / 300 PPI / High Refresh Rate
    • Front Camera: 8MP
    • Rear Camera: 16MP
    • WIFI: 802.11 a / b / g / n 2.4GHz / 5GHz WiFi Direct,WiFi,B 4.1
    • AT&T: YES
    • T-Mobile: YES
    • Verizon: YES
    • Battery: 4000mAh QC 18W Wireless charge less than 20W
    • Features: QWERTY keyboard, NFC, GPS, A-GPS, Fingerprint (side), Face unlock, G sensor, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, Light sensor
        • echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah, licensing fees are super high. Who knows what kind of battery life and displays we might have on our personal devices today if eink wasn’t so encumbered.

          • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            It’s fucking crazy cause my city just put e-ink displays on bus stops and I thought it was because they were going cheap, I guess not, though.

            • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              9 months ago

              Because e ink is basically perfect for bus stops. You don’t need to update more than once a minute or two and it uses basically no power for running 24/7.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      They can’t claim carrier compatibility yet before they even source the parts. (They’re in Japan right now sourcing Chinese parts, allegedly, and only have renders thus far.) Let alone until they have a working prototype to test against fyi.

      Carriers may very well not certify the device due to compatibility issues. Or they won’t be able to afford the certification process.

      • histic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I wonder how hard it would be to open source something similar with something like an nrf52 or similar and a 3d printed enclosure I might have to look into this tbh

        • SeekPie@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Idk if Bangle.js is open source, but I imagine a e-ink display could be possible?

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Main problem will probably be battery life. At least if you want to do more than show the time on it.

    • root@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I switched from a Pebble Time to a Gaemin Vivoactive 4s. I think it’s as close to an eink smart watch as it gets.

    • Szybet@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      SQFMI Watchy exists… And has a chinese supplier now which doesn’t suck

      The community is also active, recently a few from ground up firmwares have appeared

      • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Man, I’ve been dying to get one ever since a friend told me about em.
        While I can get them via Aliexpress, they come with a very minimal case, with the sides exposed. I’m struggling to find anyone selling replacement cases and I don’t have access to a 3d printer to make one myself unfortunately.
        I’ll keep looking though.

        • Szybet@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Look up your local 3d printer community

          • The seller on aliexpress will probably have in the future usbc version with cnc case
      • optissima@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I was trying to find a link to a supplier, could you link?

        Edit: found that it’s on mouser, but also discovered they’re using USB-Micro still, so that’s going to have to be a pass :(

        • Szybet@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          My github has a repo explaining it all, username is the same.

          The seller on aliexpress will probably have in the future usbc version with cnc case

  • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’d get this if it has other messaging apps like Signal, and banking apps…seems like it has android so should be ok. Unfortunately I don’t see it hitting the market realistically…

    • Ilandar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      My partner has an Onyx Boox Palma, which is similar in some ways. It’s fast and would be usable as a basic smartphone if it could take a SIM card. Despite the display being one of the best it is ultimately still e-ink and has many downsides if you are trying to use it like you would a normal smartphone. The ideal target market for this kind of device is really people that have already cut down their screen time and can comfortably live without most things, but still want the option to install any application if necessary.

      If you want a more conventional smartphone experience, the TCL NXTPAPER devices may be a better alternative, though they obviously have their own downsides as they do not have true e-ink displays.

  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    If it came with a good terminal app I would be very tempted. I loved my blackberry and the old slide androids.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The 69 dollar phone is a subsidized pre paid device. They plan on taking a loss on the sale and making it up with cell plans.

      Also this is a niche device for a VERY niche audience. It will never be cheap cheap, just cheap for what it is.

      • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Fun fact that’s actually how I got my top-of-the-line phone for free. I went in for a new phone&plan and we negotiated a good plan that worked for me, one that came included with a phone. When it came time to close the deal they go into the back and get me a phone. It’s a crappy hand-me-down, so naturally I ask if they have any other options. There were two more options each one took them longer to come back from and each one being pretty much the same thing. I ask if they have anything better and they go back and grab an Iphone which I declined because I don’t fuck with apple. They take the phone, very quickly put it away, then walk right up to the rack, picked one of their best phones and handed it to me. I smiled and accepted.

        Because they’re salespeople paid on commission, I was able to game the system to effectively rob the store of an expensive product and the most fucked up thing about that whole situation is that everyone involved still made more money off of me in the long term than if I walked. We really need nationalized communications utilities because the whole thing is just so ridiculous.

        • papertowels@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          So you just kept saying no until they brought you a nice phone?

          Seems like a great way to get unexpected monthly charges for a nice phone on your bill.

          • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            It’s been over 3 years now and they haven’t fucked around, mostly because if they did it would have people asking questions like “why do we have to pay a private company for a public utility anyway?” Besides, doing so would have been a breach of contract and would have opened them up to getting sued. The plan quite literally said that a phone would be provided, it never specified the quality of the phone.

      • buzz86us@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m just annoyed that they sell uncomplicated phones, but they are always hundreds of dollars. Just put an eink screen on a cheap SOC price around $40.

        • limerod@reddthat.comOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          $40 is way too low. Economics of scale do not apply for such a niche product. $140-180 should be doable.

  • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    “Minimal”

    At the software level, the Minimal Phone is based on a customized version of Android 13 and uses the MediaTek MT6769 SoC. It has 4 GB of RAM and 128 GB of internal storage. The front camera has a resolution of 8 MP and the main camera 16 MP, of which the latter comes with flash. Bluetooth and WiFi for both the 2.4 and 5 GHz bands are supported. NFC, GPS and a side-mounted fingerprint sensor are also included, as are a compass and gyroscope.

    A fingerprint sensor? 16 MP camera? This is just a regular phone with a worse display. The 2009 BlackBerry Tour had 128MB of RAM and a 3.2 MP camera, and it was high end. I realize there just isn’t a market anymore for a device that doesn’t have these features that could be priced under $400, but it really speaks to a lack of imagination in the industry.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, it was interesting, some of the comments here mentioned the price as being too high, I looked at the price and immediately thought “this is going to be vaporware”

  • fidodo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    How long does the battery last? I think a week minimum and preferably a month it’s what would be needed to make it worth it.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      “several days”

      So the same as most other modern phones under light use.

      • limerod@reddthat.comOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not the same. E-ink displays only require power when you turn on the backlight or things change on the screen. The screen on time should be higher compared to regular LCD/OLED panels.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          e-ink makes sense for like a book reader. But how often do you do that on a phone vs everything else.

          Plus it’s slow to update. This will not be a great experience for running Android.

          It’s a bizarre experiment, and the other specs are not very minimal at all, despite the name.

      • baduhai@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Oh, this looks even more interesting then. If it has an unlocked bootloader, I might actually consider it.

  • Yerbouti@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    325$, how is that low-priced? I’ve never paid more then 200$ for a phone, I have an s20+ now.