Two of the three victims specifically singled out by the New York Times in a marquee exposé published in December, which alleged that Hamas had deliberately weaponized sexual violence during the October 7 attacks, were not in fact victims of sexual assault, according to the spokesperson for the Kibbutz Be’eri, which the Times identified as the location of the attack.

The Times article described three alleged victims of sexual assault for whom it reported specific biographical information. One, known as the “woman in the black dress,” was Gal Abdush. Some of her family members have contested the claims made by the Times. The other two alleged victims were unnamed teenage sisters from Kibbutz Be’eri whose precise ages were listed in the New York Times, making it possible to identify them.

When asked about the claims made by the New York Times, Paikin independently raised their name. “You’re talking about the Sharabi girls?” she said. “No, they just — they were shot. I’m saying ‘just,’ but they were shot and were not subjected to sexual abuse.” Paikin also disputed the graphic and highly detailed claims of the Israeli special forces paramedic who served as the source for the allegation, which was published in the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, and other media outlets. “It’s not true,” she told The Intercept, referring to the paramedic’s claims about the girls. “They were not sexually abused.”

  • Pipoca@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    According to the UN

    In the context of the coordinated attack by Hamas and others of 7 October, the UN mission team found that there are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence occurred in multiple locations, including rape and gang rape in at least three locations in southern Israel.

    The team also found a pattern of victims - mostly women - found fully or partially naked, bound and shot across multiple locations which “may be indicative of some forms of sexual violence”.

    In some locations the mission said it could not verify reported incidents of rape.

    Or is the UN an Israeli propaganda machine, now?

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Since that UN report is citing Zaka (40 beheaded babies) as a “credible source,” it is indeed complete propaganda.

      New breaking points video debunking this report with an important takeaway:

      The UN is not a monolith. There are certain employees fully willing to spread certain narratives, and this is one of them.

          • Zeroxxx@lemmy.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Truth what? Faking rape is not good, denying true rape case is even worse. Fucking moron.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Tell the IDF to stop faking rape claims then. They told us back in November they had mountains of forensic evidence and thousands of witnesses. And now they can’t find a single CCTV recording and they lost the forensic evidence? They can’t even find two “witnesses” which corroborate a story.

              Until you find evidence it’s rather obvious these are nothing but lies to manufacture consent for the Genocide of Gaza.