I’ve worked with some pretty rotten software, but management software is easily the most user unfriendly, so my vote goes to HPSM.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Due to really dumb requirements we had an app that used Python, Visual basic, C and C++, MATLAB, R and JavaScript. I’m not describing an application stack. This was a single binary. The amalgamation was so disturbing that it couldn’t even shut down once run, instead asking the operating system to please, please kill me.

    Part of the installation procedure involves disabling all SSL certificate verification on company machines.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I didn’t leave the job, but I had my resignation letter written over this since I would have had to maintain it:

    My former boss had an absolute hard-on for “AI” and brought in this low-bid, fly-by-night “AI” software to automate all of our processes. I’m a fan of automation in general, but not this.

    This “solution” was basically a glorified macro generator that would screen scrape data from our apps and key into our other apps. Not only it was built on the absolute shakiest platform imaginable, but the documentation from the vendor outright told you to setup remote desktop services in a way that was in violation of licensing in order for it to work. The stack it ran on made a Rube Goldberg machine look like sleek, fine engineering.

    I repeatedly told him this was bad software, but he persisted to the point where we nearly went to production with it.

    The worst part? The applications he was screen-scraping were all internally-developed. We had access to the backend, frontend, everything. Rather than writing proper processes, he threw that piece of garbage at it.

    Luckily he retired before it went to production, and the new CTO shut it the fuck down.

    So, I didn’t quit my job over it, but I was looking and had my resignation letter written.

    • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ah yes, my last company bought into that crap. They called it RPA for Robotic Process Automation and they also used it to access internal apps that we had full control of.

      It wouldn’t have been so bad if they just used it to enter data into third party websites which had no APIs or integrations.

      At one point we updated the title of an HTML page and we had to revert the change because the RPA team said it would be a three week turnaround to fix their script.

      I noped out of there not long after, it was yet another “project management driven” company where managers and project managers were repeatedly duped by vendors and outsourcing firms instead of hiring and retaining developers.

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Didn’t leave the job over it, but SAP.

    Shitty. Ass. Program.

    • li10@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I haven’t worked with SAP directly, but did infra support for a company that used it.

      They were always having issues with it and the company they used for SAP support would routinely bill them obscene amounts even for simple tasks like updating file paths.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, fucking Business Objects was the bane of my existence. The worst situations were where the creator of the report used their shitty GUI joins instead of actually writing a SQL load script. It made troubleshooting that much more annoying.

      • Gork@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Their GUI is so bad. You had to have lookup tables printed out with various codes to find anything instead of, you know, being able to search for them.

        I’ve used a lot of software in my life and this one is by far the worst.

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      That was one of two that came to mind(a long with Oracle’s Peoplesoft). I was an HR department of one, no training, no documentation, no one who knew how it should work for HR. I often cited it, along with Peoplesoft for the explosion of solutions HR has experienced in the last 15 years.

  • thenewred@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Cisco Webex.

    You think teams or zoom are annoying? This is much worse. The worst part is with some default meeting settings, a loud chime would play every time someone joined. People kept this on for meetings of 300+ people, then they started talking over the beeps once “the popcorn slowed down.”

    • lwe@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      But have you tried Cisco Webex Teams? Or how we liked to call it “My first rails application.example.exe”.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Also the default of not auto-muting everyone, then spending 25 minutes of the meeting asking people to mute when there was a button that would also mute everyone 🤦‍♂️

    • Im_Cool_I_Promise@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      On Linux, the desktop client of Webex still does not support the chat feature, so you’re forced to use Firefox or whatever browser to join meetings instead. The best part is that some Webex rep said they’d add this feature to the client back on 2023, and it’s now 2024 and it’s STILL NOT HERE.

  • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Doesn’t matter what job I’m in, Adobe anything is always trash and their seeming monopoly on digital certificate signing in PDFs is disgusting.

  • Sean Tilley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Jira. In the Software-as-a-Service world, it’s often the tool of choice by Product teams to track issues, by breaking everything down into stories.

    It’s a horrible, slow, janky mess. The interface is confusing and poorly laid out, you can easily have too many options all over the place, and how its even used can vary dramatically from one company to another.

    Salesforce is also trash for very similar reasons. How Sales people around the world all vouched for this thing is beyond me.

    • throbbing_banjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Can confirm JIRA is an unusable mess. Submitting IT tickets was probably the worst thing about my last job. So much time wasted filling out irrelevant fields of information.

  • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Hangul Word Processor. It had (has?) an updater that would pop up ads in the taskbar. Unfortunately the developer, Hancom, is so in-bed with the Korean government, it’s mandatory software in many Korean workplaces. Korean support has gotten much, much better in every other word processor, it’s hardly necessary anymore.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Windows.

    I did an internship where my main system was Linux, but it was in a VM on one monitor with the windows host on another for using Windows apps.

    • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I work in IT and my first few jobs were working with Windows doing Desktop Support. It was extremely boring and annoying. I’ve been a long time Linux user and broke into that side, professionally as soon as I could.

  • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I hate Teams, give me Slack

    Edit: I left an optional team in teams, and still got a notification for a meeting that isn’t on my calendar, my meetings page, nor do I have access to in any other way.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      IMO Teams beats all the others on video calling specifically. But everything else it does worse than its competition. The message boards and chat features are abysmal.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I beg to differ. I’m jumping over from a Zoom workplace to a Teams workplace, and Teams is trash. Worse video, worse audio, worse connectivity, fewer end user features, etc. The only thing that’s nice is how it archives meeting chats and recordings.

        It’s only used because it’s basically free with enterprise office.

      • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        FOSDEM 2021 was hosted on Matrix. After that exp no other meetsing app lives up to it. I just want seemless chat with presentation and seemless break out rooms again.

    • TurtledUp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      You must have a nice well maintained slack instance. We just migrated to it from teams and they’ve added me to 50 + channels some with thousands of people and the whole program churns. It doesn’t send timely notifications or sometimes none at all. If I leave any of the bogus channels I get automatically added back. Nobody wants to use it we all want teams back. The worst part is it only keeps DM history for two weeks our teams would keep history for years.

      • commandar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The last point is purely a configuration thing. Our Teams instance only keeps DMs for I think 30ish days – legal wants to minimize the surface area of discoverable material. Same reason our Exchange instance nukes emails over 12 months old unless you manually move them to an archive.

      • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Adding people back to channels is definitely an admin choice. 2 weeks history is a plan limit, I think only the free tier has it.

        You can mute channels / go @s only, create new channels for whatever needs you have. Hopefully you can find a way to make it more usable within the confines of your admins config. Also note, the config may not even be intentional, so it may be worth reaching out to IT

        • TurtledUp@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m slowly starting to live with it and it’s getting better the more channels I mute and group. The notification issue is still real though I’ve adjusted quite a few settings to get it working better. Including disabling mobile notifications and making slack use it’s own notification system and not the system integrated one for Windows. The automation opportunities that exist are exciting too but will take us a while to flesh out.

  • Captain Howdy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Microsoft Windows. I used to be a sysadmin. New job is 100% Linux. Now I never touch Windows unless it’s to play a game.

    • Djtecha@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Try steam on Linux. That shit just works now and I was able to fully ditch windows 6 months ago.

  • Dehydrated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    SAP, closely followed by IBM/Lotus/(I have no idea which random company they were sold to) Notes

    I fucking hate this corporate bullshit software

  • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I’m a camera operator. I work with different cameras on every movie set. The Sony cameras are known to have the worst menu system of all. It’s extremely dense, organized in a manner that makes no sense when on set (the frequently used options are buried in sub menus) and the navigation is painful with a crappy clicky roller. Even the sales rep for Sony openly apologized for the menus. This is unacceptable for a $52,000.00 camera. On the opposite side, there’s ARRI Alexa which has the simplest menu of all. Just a few pages of organized items with simple names. And a lot of common options accessible on the main screen.

    Edit:

    here’s the Sony Venice menu simulator

    And here is the ARRI Alexa menu simulator.

    The differences may not be apparent on the simulator but they become critical when on set with a time constraint.

    • Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Same but on the live side. Interestingly Sony has it down pat for their live cameras. The global standard for camera control is a Sony controller almost everyone supports them. Grass valley on the other hand hot garbage software, really good hardware.

      • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yes I do live as well the P1 menu is great and simple, but live cameras don’t need as much controls on the operators side as it’s mostly via CCU. The grassvalley are the worst, it’s kind of impressive how bad they are.