The aircraft flew up to speeds of 1,200mph. DARPA did not reveal which aircraft won the dogfight.

  • Gigan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Jets are far more powerful than humans are capable of controlling. Flight suits and training can only do so much to keep the pilot from blacking out.

    Can they be piloted remotely? Or would that be too dangerous with latency

    • psud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes they can. Before AI the US was expecting to move to remote piloted jets

        • psud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          That’s not the case yet for fighters, just things like predator drones and global hawk

          So really just surveillance and delivery of a couple of light air to surface missiles, most reported on for assassinations

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        What’s the difference? A remotely or AI-piloted fighter jet is just a big drone.

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Drones are designed without cockpits. Retrofitting remote-control into an F-16 does not seem like the best choice to me.

          • azuth@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Retrofitting F-16s to become drones (whether rc or ai-controlled) as well as designing a variant ditching human support for weight and monetary gains is the rational choice as long as non stealth aircraft are viable. In that case you’d stick to F-35s.

            It makes no sense to waste billions worth of perfectly capable and proven airframes, engines and avionics. Any future drone that will have at least the same level of capabilities as an f-16 will cost practically cost the same. At the cost of high performance aircraft life support does not add that much cost to a plane, pilot costs (and availability) are a much bigger issue.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Latency, signal interference, and limited human intelligence are all limiting factors in that strategy.

      If the enemy interferes with any of those, the enemy wins.

      This was is already being fought with autonomous drones. By the end of it, the robots will be unrecognizable to us now.