• treefrog@lemm.ee
    791·
    8 months ago

    I love how a person that doesn’t understand what batteries are thinks they have an informed opinion on solar punk .

  • version_unsorted@lemm.ee
    783·
    8 months ago

    Honesty, I’m OK with slowing down and consuming less if it is night and the wind isn’t blowing. Lets just use that time for rest, instead of being in hyper production mode all the time.

    • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.caEnglish
      40·
      8 months ago

      This line of reasoning is broadly underrated. Sure batteries are a thing, but if a liveable world means regular brown outs, I’m cool with it. The alternative after all is so much worse.

      • mynachmadarch@kbin.social
        42·
        8 months ago

        Honestly not even brownouts. I was so hyped for the potential of IOT to let distributed power management be a bigger thing. Throw your laundry in the wash when you have enough and just let the electric company trigger it when they’ve got excess or low consumption periods to help balance things.

        Instead we get unsecure cameras or DDOS botfarms piggybacking “smart” thermostats or fridges that let you tweet.

        • grue@lemmy.worldEnglish
          121·
          8 months ago

          Giving the electric company access to turn off my appliances is also a security issue. By all means, let me subscribe to a feed that expresses what the company would like me to do and maybe I’ll set up automations to turn stuff on and off from my end, but there’s no way in Hell I’d cede control of the switch to an entity outside the premises.

    • thisfro@slrpnk.net
      51·
      8 months ago

      The author of this “punk” comment just doesn’t know how the real world works! (/s)

    • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
      1·
      8 months ago

      the thing is this isn’t even accurate. Energy storage infrastructure in some places is already capable of keeping things running

  • steal_your_face@lemmy.mlEnglish
    33·
    8 months ago

    bruh. “solarpunk” is the most unrealistic and blank genre. its almost like an Al generated. no realism at all, a lack of style. im not even diving into the fact that its most-used visual representation is freaking YOGURT AD. i think that solarpunk even less realistic than steampunk. like imagine just adding several solar panels and maybe a wind turbine to a factory or any building that consumes electricity. the authors of this “punk” just don’t know how the real world works (what are you going to do when there’s night and no wind?)

    • huginn@feddit.it
      181·
      8 months ago

      bruh. 🤦‍♂️ “solar🌞punk” ☀️ is the most unrealistic and 🙄 blank ◻️ genre. its almost like an AI generated 🤖. no realism at all, a lack of style 💃💃. im not even diving into the fact that its most-used visual representation is freaking YOGURT AD🍦🍦🍦. i think that solar🌞punk 🌱 even less realistic than steam💨punk. like imagine 🧠 just adding several solar panels ☀️ and maybe a wind turbine 🌬️ to a factory or any building 🏬 that consumes electricity⚡⚡. the authors🤓 of this “punk” just don’t know how the real world 🌎 works (what are you going to do when there’s night 🌚 and no wind💨💨💨💨🤣🤣🙂‍↔️?)"

  • Lordbaum@mander.xyz
    231·
    8 months ago

    I diagnose you with capitalism (and the resulting lack of imagination how a better world could look like)

    • JacobCoffinWrites@slrpnk.net
      11·
      8 months ago

      I think so. I mean, I’ll agree that a lot of the art tagged as solarpunk is utopian, unactionable, and generally gives a poor first impression of the rest of the genre/movement. The chromed scifi megacities with trees stuck to the sides of skyscrapers are about as attainable as concept art of a flying city or a moon colony. If they never looked past the paintings on deviantart or artstation or whatever they’d probably get a pretty skewed perspective on it.

      But I’d say the answer to that is just to make more art that reflects the rest of the movement better since the answers and discussions and real life projects are all happening

  • x4740N@lemmy.world
    121·
    8 months ago

    Apparently this doofus hasn’t heard of batteries or they are commenting in bad faith and know about batteries

    • blindbunny@lemmy.mlOPEnglish
      8·
      8 months ago

      Most definitely bad faith considering you can just Google how solar farms keep electricity.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      51·
      8 months ago

      Dude do you even know how expensive those are? You have to pay five bucks for a ten pack of AAs. How long do you think those will power your fridge?

      • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
        1·
        8 months ago

        buying non-rechargeable 🤢 I guess if you’re going for apples to apples with fossil fuels this is a good comparison

  • Binette@lemmy.ml
    91·
    8 months ago

    "Solar"punks when it’s nighttime (they revert to fossil fuels 😔) \s

  • lefaucet@slrpnk.net
    5·
    8 months ago

    Cam you post original link? I’d love to reply with images of factories with wind turbines and solar panels.

    • blindbunny@lemmy.mlOPEnglish
      11·
      8 months ago

      It’s on YouTube

      Edit: if I’m being honest this is the second upload because I didn’t want people bullying the kid on you tube.