• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Now you’re moving the goalposts. And you’ve moved them more than once already.

    First you claimed that it would be sustainable for the over a billion people in India to stay where they were because it’s possible to survive in tundras and deserts.

    Then you said that moving them to a place where water exists wouldn’t fix the problem of them dying due to a lack of a water.

    Then you asked why water would exist in the new place, which was just a silly question for anyone who understands basic geography.

    Now you’re talking about moving all of China, when China wasn’t even discussed.

    And at each step, you haven’t gone back to the previous one and acknowledged it was a silly thing to say.

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I never said India, this is the first comment india was uttered. Youre the one that brought up glaciers. And China is largely watered by glaciers, its the logical next part in the discussion. And even it was India, they also have over a billion people and you face the same problem with simply too many people.

      Immigration is not a solution.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        So you’re not going to acknowledge anything else you said. I guess there’s no point in this conversation continuing.