Twitter wasn’t just software or visible leadership (for better or worse) but an entire important slice of Internet history.

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Oh shit, I didn’t know about this. This is big! I think you could argue over whether it’s good or bad for the Fediverse but I’d argue it’s good! If/when big names and celebrities start using the platform, people on Mastodon can follow them, and that’s often cited as a barrier to Mastodon uptake.

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          What’s also great is that if, for example, Google wants to try their hand at social networks again, now they don’t have the Google+ issue of no one using it. If this new one is implemented right, Google could start their competing platform, and people could use it while still being able to connect with everyone on the Meta platform.

          If uptake is a problem for the fediverse, then if this is done right it could well solve that issue.

            • Dave@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              I think when you get a bunch of people using a federated Meta platform, and they start to connect with friends using Mastodon or others, this will introduce them to the concept of federation. And then when they talk to their friends and find they can follow all the same people but don’t have to be bombarded with ads all day, they can move to another server.

              Actually, I think I just worked out why this could go bad… if you are on Mastodon and follow someone on meta-twitter, Meta can send you ads as posts of the person you’re following… they could advertise to anyone following people on their platform without them needing to even use their platform…