The more people find out about the Green party’s policies, the more they tend to switch off. So today’s campaign launch was over in 15 minutes

  • AngusTheNerd@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    People who vote green know they won’t win an election, but do so anyway to pressure the larger parties to do more about climate change. The Greens themselves achnowledge this.

    However, the pressure won’t have much effect until they start actually taking seats from them. Standing down to give Labour a clear shot would destroy their steady gain in momentum and spoil the best chance they’ve ever had to get more seats.

    • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Which would make perfect sense if there was some way of adding ‘… but don’t count my vote if it makes electing the Labour candidate less likely’ to your ballot. As it is, the effect of voting Green is to make a Labour government, and therefore any effective action on climate change, less likely. So, your real choice is: A Labour government, that does something (even if it’s less than you’d like) or voting Green and handing government back to the Tories, and getting nothing (which is definitely less than you’d like).

      And right now, when Labour are promising to decarbonise the grid by 2030, which may well be impossible, it’s especially absurd to insist they do ‘more’. ‘More’ than borderline impossible?