I had In The House - In A Heartbeat playing in my head while making this meme

sorry for the pixelation in the corner, I used a shitty website which put a watermark there

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Same amount whether you’re disabled or not, so no, not a “restriction on disability” at all.

    Keep going down that list, though, you’ll figure it out. Just don’t feel the need to post updates.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      If you’re disabled and can’t work, you wouldn’t have an income. These places will give you money to support you if you can’t work.

      If you have income, you pay taxes when you spend that money, you’re paying for your burden………

      It’s so simple, yet you miss this? Come on. You should insult me some more, show how little you understand of the world……

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        No, if you don’t have a job or means to support yourself, you are cut off from migrating to most places, regardless of your disability status. Being disabled also doesn’t mean you can’t work or have an income.

        If you can legally move to a place as an person without disabilities, being disabled in itself will not be a blocker (apparently only in some places), as long as you meet all other requirements, which is what the meme above is about. There is a very, very wide gap between offering to take care of foreign dependents sight unseen and actively excluding disabled people because they are a “burden”. As in, only one of those is an extremely dickish, borderline eugenic stance, the other is entirely run of the mill red tape.

        As in, I migrated to another country and nobody checked my disability status, but they sure as hell checked that I had a job. Like I said in the first place.

        And even then, there are countries that will provide health care universally as a recognized human right, including undocumented migrants, even if they still require a job or income to allow visa access or permanent residency. Like I said in the first place.

        I’m running out of ways to ask you to be weird about this somewhere I can’t see you.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Huh, it’s almost like these restrictions are for ones that can’t work and provide excessive support to those who can’t work. Like autism for example, that takes the caregiver out of being a productive citizen too.

          And an income limitation is exactly that, discrimination…. If there wasn’t an income limitation, anyone from like Uganda can come in and take advantage. You’re the heartless conservative now for limiting them.

          See how you’ve made this arbitrary line yourself that’s acceptable…? Income limitation, disability limitation, why is one okay and not the other….? That’s hypocrisy you conservative….

          You call me weird and conservative, yet those are things you’ve now shown yourself since we found your line, funny how that works doesn’t it? You can’t even see how simple and easy and discriminatory an income limitation is. It limits people with disabilities most since they have issues working and making money…. Fucking lol.

          • MudMan@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            “Anyone from like Uganda and come in and take advantage” is an astonishing sentence to see anybody type.

            In any case, all of this is already debunked up there. I have zero need to keep this up. Go sit in a corner and think about this for a bit or whatever it takes to give you some perspective because, boy, you need some.

            • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Why? Because it shows how stupid it is to argue disability restrictions are weird while claiming income isn’t….?

              Yeah people usually say that when they realize they’ve put their foot in their mouth, because that’s what you’re saying should happen if disability restrictions are “weird”.

              So are income restrictions okay? While others aren’t? Can you say it aloud that you are a hypocrite, you’ve basically said it in the comments, mind as well spell it out dude.

              What’s been debunked?

              • MudMan@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                See if you follow this.

                Immigration requirements that aren’t about whether you have disabilities aren’t about whether you have disabilities.

                Good? Good. Now go google all the other ways you are wrong about this. I already started it for you and you never made it past the first country name you saw, you have a lot of homework.

                • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Immigration requirements that aren’t about whether you have disabilities aren’t about whether you have disabilities.

                  What’s that from? And how does it support your point?

                  They absolutely are, they are discriminating people who would be a burden on their social nets, the fact that you’re trying to say they are two different things speaks volumes about your conservative character.

                  You’re justifying discrimination people for one thing, while decrying another. Not a shocker that you’re a hypocrite, and are still digging that same hole while not explaining how it’s different. Just saying it’s not doesn’t prove anything lol.

                  I also didn’t need to go past the first, since all the others have income limitations too…

                  • MudMan@fedia.io
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Alright, here’s another thing for you to try to follow.

                    You not understanding a distinction doesn’t mean it isn’t obivous.