Starting from 2030, Mastercard will no longer require Europeans to enter their card numbers manually when checking out online – no matter what platform or device they’re using. Mastercard will announce Tuesday in a fireside chat with CNBC that, by 2030, all cards it issues on its network in Europe will be tokenized. In other words, instead of the 16-digit card number we’re all accustomed to using for transactions, this will be replaced with a randomly generated “token.”

The firm says it’s been working with banks, fintechs, merchants and other partners to phase out manual card entry for e-commerce by 2030 in Europe, in favor of a one-click button across all online platforms. This will ensure that consumers’ cards are secure against fraud attempts, Mastercard says. Users won’t have to keep entering passwords every time they try to make a payment, as Mastercard is introducing passkeys that replace passwords.

  • Whirling_Cloudburst@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Consumers will be able to make one-click payments at the checkout page using biometric authentication with a thumbprint

    That’s a nope from me, dog.

    • greyfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is likely something like a FIDO token/passwordless setup of some sort (i.e. Windows Hello).

      The thumbprint would just unlock the hardware device, so the thumbprint itself wouldn’t need to be transmitted to your credit issuer. This gives you full two factor authentication of your identity because you need the hardware device (something you have) and your biometric (something you are). They also often allow pins (something you know) instead of biometrics as the second factor.

  • terraborra@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah, I’m not giving them biometrics. There had better be an alternative option.

    • normalexit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’d be cool if they had a yubikey integration or some other hardware based solution where you must physically present it.

    • oktoberpaard@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I might be wrong, but I think they will probably let the OS handle the biometrics offline, which means that they won’t have access to your biometrics, they just work with cryptographic keys. Otherwise it doesn’t make sense, as apps usually don’t have direct access to the fingerprint reader. It will probably be similar to how a passkey works.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    no more custom roms if you want to actually pay for stuff. awesome.

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m always down for stuff like this but it doesn’t sound much different from having to approve the payment in the app or using one of those single-use cards. I’ll wait and see how the passkey works.

  • lud@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Interesting but I just memorized my card numbers. It’s incredibly convenient and I recommend everyone to do it.

    This might improve security though, because instead of using the same numbers everywhere you use different tokens everywhere.

    It would be cool if computers could use their smart card readers (Chip and NFC) to pay stuff online.

  • EmperorHenry@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    But guys! This isn’t going to be hackable at all! And it’s certainly not going to be a problem for problematic gamblers or anyone with compulsive spending habits

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That isn’t a concern and it shouldn’t be. People are responsible for themselves, why should I be inconvenienced because progressive iterative improvements could negatively impact a select few people that are entirely responsible for themselves?

      As for hackable, they would not do it unless it was more secure and if it is easier for the consumer what is the problem. Fraud protection is standard here anyway, never heard of someone not getting their money back when someone else uses their account.

      • EmperorHenry@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        consumer

        We aren’t consumers, We’re citizens, we’re customers, we’re users, but we aren’t consumers.

        Cars consume gasoline and diesel, fire consumes whatever it’s burning, but people are people.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          You are a consumer don’t be pedantic, you are creating the negative connotation.

  • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    If NFC was ubiquitous across all devices I could see something like this working relatively easily. But given the matrix of devices, operating systems, web browsers, apps, etc. I don’t see this as an easy task at all…

  • Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    This feels like a really good idea. I hope we get this in Canada too