• thayer@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    No, the average user will never know the difference. I couldn’t tell you exactly what the current performance impact is for hardware encryption, but it’s likely around 1-4% depending on the platform (I use LUKS under Linux).

    For gamers, it’s likely a 1-5 FPS loss, depending on your hardware, which is negligible in my experience. I play mostly first and third person shooter-style games at 1440p/120hz, targeting 60-90 FPS, and there’s no noticeable impact (Ryzen 5600 / RX 6800XT).

    • ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      If it has to go to disk for immediate loading of assets while playing a video game you’re losing more than 1-5 fps

      • thayer@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Yeah, I’m sure there are a lot of variables there. I can only say that in my experience, I noticed zero impact to gaming performance when I started encrypting everything about 10 years ago. No stuttering or noticeable frame loss. It was a seamless experience and brings real peace of mind knowing that our financial info, photos, and other sensitive files are safely locked away.

        • ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          For sure I’m just saying i’d guess that’s because at play time you’re loading everything into ram. For bulk loading I would encryption perf follows the general use case.

          (Tldr encryption shouldn’t matter for games)