• limerod@reddthat.comOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 months ago

    Cue the imminent Play Store mass app deletion which Google has just previewed and confirmed is now just six weeks away: “We’re updating the Spam and Minimum Functionality policy to ensure apps meet uplifted standards for the Play catalog and engage users through quality functionality and content user experiences.”

    From August 31, the type of apps in Google’s crosshairs will include those “that are static without app-specific functionalities, for example, text only or PDF file apps, apps with very little content and that do not provide an engaging user experience, for example, single wallpaper apps, and apps that are designed to do nothing or have no function.” Of which there are literally millions—some no doubt on your own phone.

    For developers, Google warns apps must “provide a stable, responsive, and engaging user experience… Apps that crash, do not have the basic degree of adequate utility as mobile apps, lack engaging content, or exhibit other behavior that is not consistent with a functional and engaging user experience are not allowed on Google Play.”

    • BlackLaZoR@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      basic degree of adequate utility as mobile apps, lack engaging content, or exhibit other behavior that is not consistent with a functional and engaging user experience are not allowed on Google Play.”

      They couldn’t define it any broader couldn’t they?

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      Pretty sure useful apps will be deleted too. What does even “engaging” mean?

      I hope someone will try to make an archive, e.g. the ArchiveTeam.

      • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s a generic term they can use to justify removal of any app they don’t like, which I’m sure is what this is really about

        I guess the log of “apps we want to kill but can’t justify it in a way that courts would find more acceptable” got too large.

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      For developers, Google warns apps must “provide a stable, responsive, and engaging user experience… Apps that crash, do not have the basic degree of adequate utility as mobile apps, lack engaging content, or exhibit other behavior that is not consistent with a functional and engaging user experience are not allowed on Google Play.”

      They kind of just described nearly all of their own apps [as unfit for the Play Store]…

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      meet uplifted standards

      Lol, Play doesn’t have standards.
      That’s why it’s disabled.

    • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      So any apps that follow the Unix philosophy (even without subscribing to it intentionally) are getting axed. Do something well and don’t try to bake in a million other things into your program.

      Great! They totally don’t want only apps that spy on you, are filled with bloatware and junk, and serve ads upon ads.