Intel’s stock dropped around 30% overnight, shaving some $39 billion from the company’s market capitalization since rumors of a pending layoff first emerged. The devastating results come after the chip giant reported a loss for the second quarter, complained about yield issues with the Meteor Lake CPU, provided a modest business outlook for the next few quarters, and announced plans to lay off 15,000 people worldwide.

When the NYSE closed on July 31, Intel’s market capitalization was $130.86 billion. Then, a report about Intel’s massive layoffs was published, and the company’s market capitalization dropped sharply to $123.96 billion on August 1. Following Intel’s financial report yesterday, the company’s capitalization dropped to $91.86 billion. Essentially, Intel has lost half of its capitalization since January. As of now, Intel’s market value is a fraction of Nvidia’s worth and less than half of AMD’s.

As Intel’s actions look rather desperate, analysts believe that Intel’s challenges are existential. “Intel’s issues are now approaching the existential,” Stacy Rasgon, an analyst with Bernstein, told Reuters.

  • Boozilla
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3953 months ago

    When I had to flash my BIOS and pray that it didn’t brick my PC I cursed them, saying “Fuck Intel, I hope their stock plummets!”

    You’re welcome everyone.

  • BombOmOm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2533 months ago

    It certainly doesn’t help Intel has been intentionally selling defective product in the 13th and 14th gen lines. People are quite reasonably going to AMD more and more.

    • @jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      343 months ago

      Does AMD have anything to compete with Intel QSV? I’m looking to upgrade my Plex server and was looking at a newer Intel CPU.

      • Justin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The latest AMD cpus do have transcoding, but Amd transcode isn’t very good and isn’t very compatible with Linux.

        You can pick up an Intel A310 single slot GPU for $100 and it has AV1 encode, which is something that the igpu QSV doesn’t have. Works very well in my Epyc motherboard with 76 pcie lanes. I definitely recommend going with an ATX 1st gen Epyc cpu+motherboard if you want something that can do NVMe raid.

        • @sanpo@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          233 months ago

          Amd transcode isn’t very good and isn’t very compatible with Linux

          It’s compatible just fine. But the quality… well, it’s not the worst, but definitely not the best quality.

          • @schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
            link
            fedilink
            English
            83 months ago

            Politely, not the worst compared to what, exactly?

            It’s way worse than qsv, nvenc, x264 or x265 which are basically the only hardware or cpu options you’re likely to run into doing plex transcoding.

            • @sanpo@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              43 months ago

              I don’t have QSV or NVENC hardware to compare, but AMD is perfectly fine in most cases.
              I mostly noticed quality drop with very busy scenes and some scene transitions.
              Outside of those the quality was acceptable.

              I’d say on my setup it’s comparable to software encoding with x264 veryfast preset.

              And my GPU is 5 years old now, so I’m sure newer cards have improved.

              • @schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
                link
                fedilink
                English
                43 months ago

                Lower quality at any given bitrate was my experience too. For local stuff it didn’t really matter: if I could do 3x the bitrate to get the same quality, then meh, who cares.

                If you’re streaming/doing shit over the internet/encoding for something like Youtube, though, it’s uh, not a good tradeoff because you can’t necessarily even make that tradeoff.

            • Justin
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 months ago

              I think AMF is still faster/better quality than CPU transcoding, depending on the preset.

        • @JuvenoiaAgent@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          You can pick up an Intel A310 single slot GPU for $100 and it has AV1 encode, which is something that the igpu QSV doesn’t have.

          That’s still an Intel product though…

          • Justin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            It’s the best option on the market right now and the most compatible one. The drivers are owned by the Linux Foundation, and there are no known hardware bugs with Intel GPUs, unlike with Intel CPUs. You have so much flexibility; Buying an Intel GPU doesn’t prevent you from using another CPU, even GPU-less AMD Epyc CPUs that have the cheapest PCIe/$. All you need is a PCIe slot and you get all the benefits of Intel with none of the drawbacks.

            I’m a bit of an AMD fanboy sometimes and I own AMD stock, but the A310 can’t be beat for Jellyfin transcoding. If you really hate Intel, keep in mind that Intel probably loses money on every GPU they sell 😉

      • BombOmOm
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        AMD have anything to compete with Intel QSV

        I believe AMD VCN does the same thing. Though I haven’t looked into it. AMD chips also have pretty decent onboard video cores, so you might be able to do hardware accelerated encoding that way too.

        was looking at a newer Intel CPU

        Just stay away from Intel 13th and 14th gen chips. They have oxidation issues from the factory and are also over-volting themselves. The former is unfixable and the latter causes unfixable damage.

      • @CCMan1701A@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        I find software reencoding/remux instead of doing it on the fly is easier for my brain to manage over alignment of the hardware stars.

      • @solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        I hardly ever transcode at home. I mostly use ffmpeg on a crappy old i5 server that I use for other beataround stuff too. I tend to do that in batch mode and it’s fast enough for my purposes. That’s an approach to consider. Or you could spin up Intel VM’s as needed on Hetzner unless you’re doing a totally ridiculous amount of transcoding.

        • @jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 months ago

          I need on-location transcoding because my internet is garbage (~50 mbps). Sometimes my users need to transcode the show if the bit rate of the file is too high for my internet to keep up.

          • @solrize@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            33 months ago

            Wait you’re literally serving other users from a home internet? Oh man, get a VM or some colo space or something. Or faster internet. Your internet is much faster than mine and one reason I transcode remotely is to drop the bit rate enough that I can download the transcoded version without waiting all day.

            • @jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              23 months ago

              I mean, I can stream 4K HDR if the player supports the video format, but clients don’t always jive well with whatever Radarr decided. I know I can fine tune it but everything works well enough right now and I don’t have time to change it.

              I move around too much to do colocation. A VPS/VM isn’t worth the cost to me. My server is all old parts and I don’t pay for power usage.

  • @Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1933 months ago

    These fucking idiots. All they had to do was pretend they gave a fuck about the chip debacle and play everything slowly. They couldn’t even do that. They couldn’t even pretend to give a fuck about anyone. Neither their customers nor their employees.

    If they replaced the C-suite with the custodial staff, they would be in a significantly better position than they are now. Executives are always dumb as fuck, with very few exceptions. Pre-requisites for the job: narcisism, sociopathy and idiocy.

    • Billiam
      link
      fedilink
      English
      453 months ago

      If they replaced the C-suite with the custodial staff, they would be in a significantly better position than they are now. Executives are always dumb as fuck, with very few exceptions. Pre-requisites for the job: narcisism, sociopathy and idiocy.

      Are we still talking about Intel, or…?

      • @KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        243 months ago

        The funny thing is that there are executives who know what they’re doing, but they may be outvoted by people who failed upward due to connections or a “good background” (ivy league, internship, etc.).

        I always thought “what does a brand name education prove?” This isn’t the 1800s. Community college now is almost as good as Harvard was in the 1800s. Back then, just being able to read meant that you were educated.

        Also, what does an internship prove? You know how to carry 8 coffees at once? You can wear a cheap suit? No, it’s all cover for connections. If businesses wanted the best people (say the top 10%) you could literally just set up a table outside a subway station and interview random commuters, getting probably 10 good prospects in a day.

        • @Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          183 months ago

          Ivy League, internships etc. prove exactly what you are critizising. They prove to have the connections. They prove to be part of the in-group. They prove that you will defend your class interests against the lower classes. And if you are one of the very few people who achieve upwards class mobility, they prove that you will be betraying them.

          This is not about running the best company or running the best economy. It is about maintaining class power and privilege.

          • @KevonLooney@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            33 months ago

            This is not about running the best company or running the best economy. It is about maintaining class power and privilege.

            I understand your point, but neo-marxist perspectives like this fundamentally misunderstand what companies care about (for obvious reasons). No company cares about “class power” or “privilege” because shareholders only care about their own money.

            Their “class” is not important when it comes to investing. If they could fire all the nepo babies and use AI instead, they would do it in 1 second.

            • @Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              53 months ago

              Their “class” is not important when it comes to investing. If they could fire all the nepo babies and use AI instead, they would do it in 1 second.

              Firing the nepo babys remains consistent with being the owning class. And they put the nepo babies so they dont have to put rising middle and lower class people there.

              • @KevonLooney@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                03 months ago

                It’s not. Investors literally only care about money.

                Rich people don’t have “class consciousness” because they all want to be better and richer than other rich people. That’s what “keeping up with the Joneses” (or Kardashians) is. You don’t want the Joneses to improve, because that hurts you.

                It’s a zero-sum game at the top. If your neighbor buys a Mercedes, you need to buy a Maserati. Like I said, neo-marxism fundamentally misunderstands rich people.

                • @Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  73 months ago

                  I think you misunderstand rich people. Why do you think they make PACs? Why do you think they make Ivy Leagues and send their kids there? Why do you think they keep up all these illusions. Do you think they are too stupid to realize that you can get an equivalent education for a fraction of that money?

                • @BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  53 months ago

                  Rich people don’t think these things consciously. The wealthy don’t think, “How can I best ensure the worker class remains oppressed?” They simply act selfishly, and their actions together with the actions of other selfish people lead naturally to oppression.

                  Until they get wealthy enough to buy politicians, at which point it does consciously become “How can I best ensure the worker class remains oppressed?”

  • @cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    124
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Brutal, nearly the lowest since 2008. Makes me want to buy in at this point.

    Edit: I bought a few shares, so now they’re sure to go bankrupt by tomorrow.

    Edit 2: ayyy did I actually catch a falling knife for once? It’s still going up after hours.

    • bluGill
      link
      fedilink
      443 months ago

      The market does tend to overreact so this is possible a sign to buy low. I can’t be bothered to check the fundamenals but it seems unlikely that amd is a better investment long term. If you are not looking at least 5 years to the future stocks are a bad idea.

      • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        OTOH: Boeing. Had the 737 Max bug been a one-off incredibly bad fuck up, they would have been a good buy. Then it turned out that that bug was just the first sign of many deep seated issues with their production process. Boeing 100% deserves everything they’re getting. Management skipped right over lawful, chaotic, and neutral evil and went into stupid evil, and decided that sacrificing QC/QA on aerospace equipment would be a great way to get returns for shareholders.

        • @krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          293 months ago

          They didn’t skip those steps. The market just ignored the fact that they’ve been stepping through those options for the last 30 years because that’s what the market as a whole has been doing. As cliche and annoying as it sounds, this is exactly what late stage capitalism looks like. Once growth through sales becomes difficult, usually from approaching monopolistic size in a market, they only have two options left. They can either cut corners and headcount to save on operational expenses or they can decrease revenue growth. Considering the fact that the central thesis of our economy is the idea that infinite growth is not only possible but the only valid pursuit of any corporation it’s easy to guess what they’re going to do when faced with declining sales or any other detriment to growth.

        • ✺roguetrick✺
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          And the frank truth is, if things heat up on the Taiwan strait, TSMC is toast and Samsung won’t be able to pick up the slack.

          • @trolololol@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            73 months ago

            It’s going to take 3d chess from China to put their hands in TSMC without US bringing in “democracy”. That factory is more strategic than oil.

            • ✺roguetrick✺
              link
              fedilink
              English
              23 months ago

              It ain’t worth a nuclear war. Why do you think the feds are so focused on domestic manufacturing? The Arizona TSMC factory is just shipping workers from Taiwan it’s so dependent. I’d hate to see what the actual supply chain looks like.

        • @trolololol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          Nah a lot of companies dead to economy power obsolete government things (army is part of govt by the way) and they just get special contracts and otherwise just fully die.

      • @brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        AMD is super hot right now. Not in a good way.

        I bought AMD at $8/share (and am still holding it), and I’m getting a similar vibe from Intel now…

        • @cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          73 months ago

          I bought AMD at $8/share (and am still holding it)

          Wow, I’d have dropped that hot potato ages ago.

          • @brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            103 months ago

            I am glad I didn’t lol. Still not, the datacenter GPUs are something else, and so is their multi-chip design prowess.

  • @Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1143 months ago

    And some moron on Wallstreetbets just invested his $700k inheritance in shares yesterday. He’s -200k rn

    • @captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      773 months ago

      The stock market is the least stupid way to be addicted to gambling but it’s still one of the dumber addictions to develop.

        • shastaxc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 months ago

          Except unlike casinos, there are breakers in place to prevent crazy jackpot earnings. Don’t expect to 10x your money in a day… Or month.

          • @Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Expect? No.

            Possible? With trading in puts and calls options definitely.

            Still stupidly risky gambling where you loose most of the time? Absolutely

      • @calcopiritus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        Depends of how you look at it, it might be even worse.

        At least with casinos you know that mathematically, the more you play the more you lose. With stocks though, you have the hope that you can win it back.

      • @theangryseal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -93 months ago

        When you ain’t got nothing, you got nothing to lose bud. That’s where I’m at in this moment. If I lose every penny I have I’m still poor. If I don’t, maybe I can get a start on a damn house or something.

    • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Wow I am glad I only lost 10k and called it expensive stock market crash course. Apparently minute trading is not that easy

      And that person is waiting for recovery, classic move. Next phase is trying to win it all back

      I am so glad I got this lesson before the inheritance, I would 100% do something similar

        • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I am not exactly super good with money to be honest, recently I bought like full set of apple pro devices and now I am thinking how to get liquidity for UV skincare and clothes, I desperately need clothes, and body laser and several plastic surgeries and… yeah.
          But I learned something from all these sprees I hope. It’s that I am not rich and shouldn’t behave like I am. I may be slightly stupid tho, in an adhd way.

  • @Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    813 months ago

    It’s not everyday that I’m thankful that grandma didn’t leave me $700,000 but today is one of those days

    • RubberDuck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      493 months ago

      Well a lot of products have these things in them and a lot of people have no clue they are getting sold a defective product. This is all on intel, do not blame the customer because the big corporation is selling defective goods.

    • darki
      link
      fedilink
      English
      203 months ago

      More than that, for years it has been eating more and more watts and the electricity prices went up… But still , most simp for Intel 💀

      • @Bbmin7b5@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        Since the 5800X3D It’s been known that AMD delivers similar or better performance than Intel’s top-of-the-line chips with far lower power usage and cheaper prices.

        Knowing that why would anyone buy the inferior product?

        • @LotrOrc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Because most people don’t actually know that.

          Most people have no idea where their laptops are coming from or what makes them run.

          If you pay attention and you know about computers you would have heard something, but I guarantee you the average person has heard almost nothing about Intel’s issues

  • darki
    link
    fedilink
    English
    683 months ago

    More than that, for years their CPUs have been eating more and more watts and the electricity prices went up… Just keep them on par with AMD CPUs… But still , most default to Intel…

  • @Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    603 months ago

    After how horribly they handled the whole hardware defect scandal with their 13th and 14th gen i Series processors, this is 100% deserved.

    Intel is a cautionary tale of what happens when you allow bean counters who care more about EBITDA than their customers and staff to run the show.

    • @Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      253 months ago

      This sounds like a modern day version of the Schlitz mistake back in the seventies where they cut the quality so much, so fast, that the formerly largest brewery in America became a worthless brand that nobody trusted.

      The b-school lesson from this was to drop the quality of your product more slowly so people wouldn’t notice.

      I figured no big company would ever suffer consequences from shitty product ever again because they’d figured out the drip instead of the open floodgates.

      I hope more companies get to enjoy this fate, especially food producers.

    • @ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      143 months ago

      I grew up in an era where IBM reign supreme.

      A decade ago, it dipped to 1990s level but now it’s pretty up there in value again.

      I don’t understand tech company stocks at all.

        • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yes, it seems like people always forget about inflation. Okay yes your one milion will be two millions in 14 years at 5% yearly but it will be worth only 1.25 million corrected for inflation so you just made 25% over 14 years. And that’s for just 3% year to year inflation.

          So companies must at least grow by inflation rate to stay afloat.

          Inflation is a word that haunts me to be honest. It is 8% here right now. Which means value of money will be halved in 9 years

      • @gcheliotis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        IBM went through a huge transformation. More than one probably. Most if not all giant firms have had to reinvent themselves many times over. I remember the pivot from a technology company to services and consulting, which was hugely controversial, as I got to see that relatively up close. I won’t forgive them for giving up thinkpad though.

    • @VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      Oh how the mighty have fallen

      I can still recall my first PC, I used to love smashing the turbo button. No fucking clue what it did, but it sure was fun to press!

  • Toes♀
    link
    fedilink
    English
    553 months ago

    I never imagined a world where Intel was the little fish. Wild

  • @KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    543 months ago

    Fucking good! I know it’s not the primary reason, but it’s by high time that people see laying off 15k people as a bad thing and the company suffering for it.

    • @Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      293 months ago

      I fear it’s wishful thinking that the layoffs are what made the stock tank. It’s certainly never hurt anyone else…

        • @aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          73 months ago

          The actions we are taking will make Intel a leaner, simpler and more agile company.

          Oof, now agile bullshit talk is infecting the lingo of the c-suite and being used as justification to do layoffs. I should’ve seen that coming, though I must’ve skipped the portion of the agile manifesto that said to choose Lamborghinis over employees.

            • @Blackmist@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              53 months ago

              I’m guessing those chips are a tiny fraction of Intel’s revenue.

              AMD have been eating their lunch on more than just gaming PCs.

            • @corbin@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 months ago

              Stock price is largely about future earnings potential, not current quarter or past results. That’s why a company can have record-breaking earnings, but still eat shit in stock price for a while if it lowers predictions for next quarter.

      • @dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 months ago

        layoffs are what made the stock tank

        Yeah, it’s usually the opposite: Layoffs by themselves usually make the stock go up, as the company is reducing their expenses.

        The issue with Intel is that they announced layoffs combined with a bad earnings call, so it’s a sign the company isn’t going so well.

        • @Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          73 months ago

          I think the AI thing has really caught them off guard. There’s a gold rush and they have no real shovels to sell.

          Intel’s only hope now is for the Chinese army to go for a holiday in Taiwan. Their competitors are hugely reliant on TSMC. That’s been brewing forever though, and hopefully will continue to not come to anything. The last thing the world needs right now is more fucking war…

  • Granbo's Holy Hotrod
    link
    fedilink
    English
    523 months ago
    1. glad I just went with AMD. Dodged a bullet.
    2. Man that 11 billion they just got from us, so hot.
  • sp3ctr4l
    link
    fedilink
    English
    443 months ago

    They also announced they are going to stop paying stock dividends starting Q4.

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/intel-to-suspend-dividend-cut-15-of-staff-upon-big-earnings-miss-d811a220

    Back in ye olden days, you used to buy a stock largely due to its ability to regularly pay you back a dividend, as a more conventional kind of investment, before the more modern idea of ‘buy low sell high’ became the most prevalent investment strategy / market dynamic.

    • @technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -14
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s hilarious how people will shit on NFTs but not non-dividend stocks that are just corporate NFTs without even a jpg of a monkey.

      • sp3ctr4l
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Nope, not even close.

        NFTs are wildly, wildly more speculative investments than the stock market, having absolutely 0 solid foundation of an actual business with capital and products and services behind them, they have a proven track record of 99% of them losing 99% of their value in a year or two, and 99% of them are just outright scams.

        Go watch a some Folding Ideas videos for a more in depth explanation.

        After a decade plus of watching crypto currencies evolve, the only one that actually does what a crypto currency was originally supposed to do is monero, xmr: Secure, very hard to trace transactions that can be done with anonymity, provided you learn a whole bunch of opsec.

      • @aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        Dude nfts are like worse than digital beanie babies, because at least with the beanie babies there was a trademark restriction.