• tal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, they aren’t going to feel the need to explain themselves, but I suspect that this will make for quite the New York Times article.

    • zekiz@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes. That’s what I’m talking about. It would just sound so funny. I can already see the headline “Reddit banns r/Anime_Titties Moderator for allowing anime titties”

      What is funny is that tits itself aren’t even pornographic so you technically don’t even have to “warn” anyone.

        • tal@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          A pretty common convention on Reddit, started by, if I recall correctly, /r/earthporn, is that many major subreddits, like /r/foodporn and such, devoted to non-pornographic images end in “-porn”, where “-porn” just means “attractive image”. If you’re going to be browsing images on Reddit during work hours and the issue that your boss is going to have is with you browsing a non-pornographic site that has a pornographic name, you’re probably in for some explaining anyway.

          EDIT: Oh, if you mean that you’re objecting to tits in general being on the sub rather than reading news on /r/anime_titties, disregard.

            • Stellario@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I just set up a community for fuzzy baby animal pics called “FurryPorn.” No pics yet, but I’m sure there will be some soon.