jeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 7 个月前'Thanks to Citizens United': 50 Megadonors Have Put Over $1.5 Billion Into 2024 Electionwww.commondreams.orgexternal-linkmessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1487arrow-down14cross-posted to: progressivepolitics@lemmy.world
arrow-up1483arrow-down1external-link'Thanks to Citizens United': 50 Megadonors Have Put Over $1.5 Billion Into 2024 Electionwww.commondreams.orgjeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 7 个月前message-square49fedilinkcross-posted to: progressivepolitics@lemmy.world
minus-squareaubeynarf@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 个月前How would the Democrats “get rid of” a supreme court decision? Proponents of which party brought the case? Appointees of which party were in the deciding majority on the court?
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 个月前 How would the Democrats “get rid of” a supreme court decision? Stacking the courts and bringing another case. Or an amendment. So like I said, we’re stuck with it.
minus-squareMaggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·7 个月前SCOTUS does not need a case to reverse itself or review a law. In fact there’re startlingly few rules around SCOTUS.
How would the Democrats “get rid of” a supreme court decision?
Proponents of which party brought the case? Appointees of which party were in the deciding majority on the court?
Stacking the courts and bringing another case. Or an amendment.
So like I said, we’re stuck with it.
add more justices
SCOTUS does not need a case to reverse itself or review a law. In fact there’re startlingly few rules around SCOTUS.