• pup_atlas@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t see this as enshittification. It’s a real thing that’s happening, but raw storage is expensive. They pay for it directly. Unlike artificially limiting features that are “free” to them, this genuinely isn’t, it’s not even really super discounted for them on the backend. They’re likely just paying for a series of S3 buckets.

    • Count042@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’m a sys admin/devops engineer, and yes, storage is far more expensive then people realize.

      This is the very definition of enshittification.

      EDIT: To those downvoting:

      Do you actually know what the definition of enshittification is? Apparently not.

      Enshittification (alternately, crapification and platform decay) is a pattern in which online products and services decline in quality. Initially, vendors create high-quality offerings to attract users, then they degrade those offerings to better serve business customers, and finally degrade their services to users and business customers to maximize profits for shareholders.

      It doesn’t matter that the cost of storage is a real thing. They gave things of value away for free to grow their user base and to try and capture network effects. Now that they think they have that they are taking away ( or decreasing ) the free stuff of value they gave away.

      The fact that storage has value is literally an important part of enshitification.

      It wouldn’t be enshitification if they gave away free stuff that wasn’t valuable.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Except not, this is what social media is supposed to do, allow people to upload things to share. They’ve done perfectly well for all these years on it, it’s not some new crazy problem. It’s existing functionality they are removing, that’s on them.

      • pup_atlas@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Discord isn’t a social media. With platforms like facebook, you’re still paying for all your storage, just not with money. There’s ads all over the platform, and all your content is data mined to be sold to advertisers. Discord doesn’t data mine (to my knowledge) OR run ads. Would you prefer a higher limit at the cost of having ads all over the interface? The AWS bill has to get paid somehow, nothing is free.

    • Butterpaderp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Based on all of the changes discord has made over the past few years, its absolutely enshittification

    • zaph@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      Just like YouTube. They need the ad revenue to keep all those videos saved to their servers. It’s only natural you watch a 30 second ad every 10 seconds. It isn’t enshittification because it’s a real thing that’s happening, and raw storage is expensive. They pay for it directly.