A report from Morgan Stanley suggests the datacenter industry is on track to emit 2.5 billion tons by 2030, which is three times higher than the predictions if generative AI had not come into play.

The extra demand from GenAI will reportedly lead to a rise in emissions from 200 million tons this year to 600 million tons by 2030, thanks largely to the construction of more data centers to keep up with the demand for cloud services.

  • مهما طال الليل
    link
    fedilink
    294 days ago

    Consider this: climate change is being accelerated at a time when we are overdue to reduce it and what we are getting out of it is plagiarism and wrong answers.

  • @Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    715 days ago

    the most fucked up part about this is that it’s not like regular people account for more than a fraction of the AI usage, most of it is just other companies using it to replace workers or just… paying for AI usage instead of fucking paying a stock photo company instead…

    i hate corporations i hate corporations i hate corporations

  • @taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    815 days ago

    When I think “AI will end humanity” I was thinking a sort of Skynet type deal, not… this. Sigh.

    • @ampersandcastles@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 days ago

      Oh, this isn’t it. Capitalists have been doing this long before AI. Which is why I don’t understand why people are attacking AI so hard, tbh.

  • @DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    67
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    …and all so they can steal our collective content, creativity, and every piece of individual thought or content we’ve ever communicated online.

    …with the aim of exploiting it to make billionaires richer.

      • zout
        link
        fedilink
        195 days ago

        Still, open source AI will still help the same companies getting richer because the needed computing power can be found in these data centers. The companies don’t even care if it’s AI, crypto or whatever the next thing is, as long as it needs lots of power and bandwidth.

  • @shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I am curious who buys generative AI services? The consumers seem to be people making memes or questionable porn with free services. It can’t prepare food, unblock drains or tile a bathroom. You can’t use it for anything like medicine, law or engineering where you would be professionally liable if it fucks up. How is it sustainable?

    • WasPentalive
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 days ago

      It’s good for making up stories and making suggestions. I worked with chatGPT on how to power up a mothballed Galaxy Class starship. We created the procedure to bring the ship from inert and vacuumed to ready for warp flight.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      34 days ago

      My company buys it. No idea what they use it for since I work in IT and I don’t use it for anything.

    • @B0rax@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      34 days ago

      A lot of companies buy it so their employees have acres to it. Like Microsoft 365 copilot for example

      • Rhaedas
        link
        fedilink
        125 days ago

        Over time, it is. It’s eliminating the source. In Terminator, Matrix, and others they say that the AI took a split second to act, but our AI doesn’t have those connections. It’s working with what it’s got.

    • @akwd169@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      24 days ago

      Too bad for us, yeah.

      The people benefiting from this have more than enough money to stay comfortable and live a long life if the environment becomes hazardous, deadly and inimical to human life.

      It’s the masses who will suffer, who will be forced to live in tiny bunkers just to survive and work for the capitalists, never going outside until an extreme weather event wipes them away despite their budget bunker

      And the capitalist ruling class will say “oh look more space to expand my summer bunker”

    • ms.lane
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      That already happened with Crypto.

      AI will use less power over time, as hardware gets faster and we approach a ‘good enough’ level of computation power, similar to Desktops/Laptops - outside gaming, electrical power for the average desktop has only decreased since Sandy Bridge, a 2600K is still good enough for the average desktop, it can still even pull punches gaming.

      Crypto, by design, will never decrease in power use and only and forever increase.

  • melroy
    link
    fedilink
    55 days ago

    And then people were complaining about cryptocurrencies… Look at this AI joke… Come on…

    • melroy
      link
      fedilink
      45 days ago

      ow nevermind, bitcoin mining alone is consuming 112.31 TWh annually (it’s a guess). While AI is using 29.2 TWh annually (also a guess).

      • ms.lane
        link
        fedilink
        English
        05 days ago

        And AI will eventually go down (it will go up a lot before that though) as hardware becomes fast enough.

        Crypto by design will never decrease.

        • melroy
          link
          fedilink
          25 days ago

          I’m afraid the power needs for AI will also not decrease. Even if individual models become more efficient and the hardware become more AI optimized. The next logical step is to run even more if those AIs as agents and creating huge chain of thoughts… So no, ai power usage will increase.

      • @ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I can guess too! With my guess, AI is already using 420 TWh annually!

        What if we wouldn’t guess anything like this? This is not just not meaningful, but straight out misleading.

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      65 days ago

      then why are data centers using these fossil fuel power plants?

      why are they getting lower rates to use them than an individual taxpayer?

      • @cryptiod137@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 days ago

        What else would they use? Thats what’s available

        Because they can build more capacity based on a long term contract with the utilities.

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          14 days ago

          That’s just how things are… Fuck your peasants

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          14 days ago

          Cities don’t build power plants generally esp not large scale fossil fuel type

            • sunzu2
              link
              fedilink
              12 days ago

              That’s right and that’s why they should be charged premium for their vanity exercises instead of being subsidized by the taxpayers

    • zout
      link
      fedilink
      115 days ago

      Tell me about it. In the Netherlands wind farms are built, and, on paper, these datacenter companies buy up all of the energy from them. Meanwhile, the reason why these wind farms were built is to burn less fossil fuels, but that won’t work now because of all the extra energy consumption.

        • zout
          link
          fedilink
          65 days ago

          What you call a good thing, I call green washing.

    • mub
      link
      fedilink
      15 days ago

      Power is only part of it. Concrete production is a huge greenhouse gas source.

  • @jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    -1
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    U.S. vehicles currently emit 2 billion tons. So that’s very bad news.

    However – I think 2030 is waaay too far in the future to predict anything about AI.