• pahalie@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I, personally, used a flat fee realtor and pocketed commission (2.5%) that seller provided (minus flat fee), technically, saving ~2.1% of the home price. I’m just sick of realtors who are taking in total ~15 BILLION per year in Canada alone - ah how great it is to take % on market where average price is $650,000. It’s fucked up. They are not that helpful to pay so much.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      There’s certainly something to be said about the inflated price of homes. It used to be that when houses were $200-250, that 3% was a fairly reasonable fee for all the leg work a realtor should be doing (there’s a lot of backend paperwork done in the office). But I’ll agree now that houses are stupid expensive, it’s excessive. It’s also important to remember that the entire real estate industry is purely commission, no one gets paid unless houses sell (everyone from agents, transaction coordinators, title reps, escrow people, etc). My wife is an agent, and when houses aren’t selling, she isn’t making anything, and she works her ass off.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      15b without talking about the number of transactions is meaningless and prices wouldn’t be lower without agents as the person buying is still paying that price, they don’t care who the money goes to.

      • Jikiya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        In an imaginary scenario, if I go to sell my house, and know that I’ve got a 400k loan to pay off and the house is worth around 400k, I’m going to factor in what I have to pay the agents and set it for 420k (assuming 2.5% for both selling and buying agents to split). I’m not going to be walking away from that still owing money to the bank.

        The prices always factor in how much will be going to the agent(s). You will not accept a price that is below what you need.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          You will sell for whatever buyers are ready to pay for it, buyers don’t need to know how much you’re losing to the agent, they want to know how much is coming out of their pockets and if they can afford the associated mortgage. People don’t sell their house to be charitable, they sell their house and try to maximize profit, if there’s less going to an agent it just means more going to the seller.

          Hell, just look at the prices on direct sales vs with agents, people always overestimate the value of their property when selling by themselves.

          • Jikiya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            You won’t sell at all if it doesn’t meet your minimum cash in pocket amount.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              If you need to move you need to move, you’ll sell it for however much you’re able to get. If you’re not in a rush and you’re able to get 420k when selling with an agent that’s the price you’ll try to get by selling it yourself.

              Again, look at direct sales, prices aren’t lower than with agents.