- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.ml
cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/42738519
I really like the safety aspect of this, but 72% capacity after 300 cycles seems low. What’s a use case scenario where this is preferable over lipo batteries?
Much more stable chemistry. In stationary applications, like UPS systems and off grid electrical systems, lead acid is still the standard, due to having stable chemistry, very unlikely to catch fire, and a cost to capacity ratio that is still very good.
The degradation seems pretty bad, but if it’s stable from 300 cycles onwards, you could take 75% as the actual capacity of the battery.
Boats, planes, drones, phones, bikes… Anywhere that you can maximize storage cell capacity in odd shaped volumes and spaces/designs. It’s great.
Dildos
Why do you think they’re called D batteries? 😏
👆
Having looked at comparative data, it’s not really out of the norm…
But, do they cause a runaway thermal reaction if pierced?
I demand spicy pillows, not mild ones
it is so interesting to learn just how far behind articles like this are
I bet if you cut it vertically the lights will go out.
But does it make a boom when Mossad needs it?
Big if true
deleted by creator