• deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes. There’s only 3 major browsers. Chromium (Chrome), Firefox, WebKit (Safari). Nearly every other webbrowser is a fork of one of these, most are forks of Chromium, including Opera. As such, most webbrowsers will be affected by the change.

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Chrome browser = chromium plus Google

        Samsung browser = chromium plus garbage

        Brave browser = chromium plus crypto and homophobia

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I don’t think it should’ve been opt-out, but Mozilla’s ad metrics development is very much the direction ads on the web should go in. It is impossible to determine who you are from the data. They’ve truly done a good job on creating an ad model that’s privacy friendly, and would be a material improvement to the web.

            It’s a way to still have ad revenue funding the content we all consume, while also still maintaining privacy. It’s a good thing. It’s just the opt-out aspect for existing installs that’s bad.

            That said, I’m personally a proponent of just using adblock lol

            • TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              I also use adblocking at multiple levels so it wasn’t a huge thing for me (been blocking Pocket and other bullshit for years at the dns and network levels) but I still feel like Mozilla witnessed Google going for broke with killing mv2 and inline ads on YouTube and decided wellll our existing users probably wouldn’t notice or care if we slipped in an opt-out fuckery… But we did. Immediately.

              For any browser trying to sell itself as “the only privacy browser on the market” this was a dumb fucking move by any metric. Like why not just openly admit we’re going with the Brave browser model?

            • TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              No it’s not. But if we’re hoping Firefox will be better in some way we’d expect more from them. Wouldn’t we?

        • Mwa@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Brave browser = chromium plus crypto and homophobia

          the crypto stuff can be opt out tho

    • gnawmon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Good, hopefully I can convince my friends to switch over

      • deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        DuckDuckGo’s webbrowser is somewhat unique, in the sense that it isn’t its own browser at all. It’s a “WebView”, using the OS built-in webbrowser with a coat of paint.

        This means it’s Blink/Chromium on Android and Windows, and WebKit on iOS and macOS.

      • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        depends on the OS!

        DuckDuckGo uses the default rendering engine of whatever OS you use it on, so webkit (also used by safari) on macOS and iOS and blink (also used by edge and chrome) on windows and android

        even if it uses the same rendering engine on some platforms, it’s not based on chromium, so it’s not a chromium browser