• abff08f4813c@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    204
    ·
    1 year ago

    To all the folks saying that reddit couldn’t replace the mods, that it was too big an effort, that they couldn’t run a big sub all by themselves, I have only one thing to say to you.

    You were right.

    • NotTheOnlyGamer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sure users will step forward if they care. Otherwise, it’s just a campaign optimization at work. Limit the breadth of organic content to deepen the brand-friendly content and push more paid media into the feed.

      • OpenStars@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes they most definitely will…but increasingly such things likely will not happen on the Reddit platform, moving forward. There are actual reasons that the mods left - e.g. to moderate a sub of millions of subscribers takes effort, which needs tools to make that happen - and those reasons still exist.

        • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thing is, people stay on Facebook because their friends and family are on Facebook. Reddit is far more anonymous and therefore has far less inertia.

          • Thorned_Rose@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I would drop kick FB in a heart beat if it wasn’t for that shitty platform being my only means of communication with some family and friends. WTF happened to email and phone calls/txt jesus.

              • Thorned_Rose@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I wish I could do that. But I’m disabled which is isolating by itself but also makes maintaining friendships difficult let alone making new friends.

                So unfortunately the few friends I do have are firmly entrenched in FB and I have little recourse to make more friends. They’re good people. Genuinely good people so I don’t want to ditch them anyway, they’ve just been wicked into social media addiction and entrapment the same way many have been.

      • abff08f4813c@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m sure users will step forward if they care.

        This is the part I didn’t quite get. Like I am sure that there were users who requested this sub in r/redditrequest after r/TIHI became unmoderated.

        For some reason I don’t understand, these requests did not pan out and it ended up getting shut down instead.

        At the very least, users stepping forward doesn’t seem to be enough on its own.

        • CrazyEddie041@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          38
          ·
          1 year ago

          If I had to guess, there are too many users who would become appointed as moderators, then just shut down the subreddit again. The admins need time to filter through the applications to find the genuine bootlickers.

          • Skray@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah I fully expect reddit to replace the moderators but it will take time and effort to select the right people.

            If all the mods who protested actually resigned or moved their subs to being unmoderated it would’ve crippled the site, reddit would not be able to replace them quick enough.

            It’s unfortunate that the threat alone was enough to get most of them to reopen.

        • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          From the one time I tried requesting a sub there, they don’t just let someone have a sub if they ask and it’d be banned otherwise, they probably won’t give it to you if you don’t have mod experience for example (the reason I didn’t get the niche sub I was trying to revive, which is reasonable enough), or if they feel that what experience you do have isn’t enough that you’d likely be able to handle the particular sub. TIHI is a big sub, so they’d not just be looking for any random volunteer, it’d have to be someone experienced with moderating sizable subs, probably. And those people are, well, exactly the kind of people angry with reddit right now.

          • hypelightfly@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Reddit gave the snackexchange subreddit to someone who had no mod experience and hadn’t participated in the sub for years. The person claims they didn’t even ask for the position and only asked for the head mod to be removed. Reddit removed the top mod and made the person top mod.

            • Anomander@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That person had effectively no mod experience, but was already on the moderator list there - having been added by the old team.

              Head mod chose to reopen under protest by turning off anti-scam bots and similar - letting sub continue to function visibly the same, but without the bot-supported protection it had used prior. He somehow talked his way onto the team during the protests, and then went to Admin and arranged to oust the head mod who had shut down the bots and was doing protest stuff in the sub.

              He has since been returned to the bottom of the mod hierarchy there, for whatever that’s worth.


              Like, I kind of get that guy’s point in some senses - simply turning off security features that quietly protect users, without announcing it, sure seems like the kind of thing that would hurt users pretty quick - without ever affecting site Admin. Especially when the head mod who shut down those bots wasn’t the user/mod who was responsible for them, it’s not ‘their’ bot if they’re gonna go home and take their toys, as it were.

              Staging a coup and getting Admin to put him at the top of the modlist is hyper shitty, and Admin’s decision to promote someone who wasn’t really part of that community to that sort of position is utterly inexplicable if we were trying to square their actions with their stated values.

          • lunarul@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            it’d have to be someone experienced with moderating sizable subs, probably

            So someone who was using moderation tools provided by 3rd party apps?

        • Anomander@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Admin realized that despite all the applications, there were:

          • People requesting the subreddit so they could continue the protests.
          • People requesting the subreddit so they could give it back to the original mods.
          • People requesting the subreddit so they could own it.
          • People requesting the subreddit because they have strong feelings about “moderation” and want to /worldpolitics it.
          • Absolutely no one who wanted to just do what the old mods did.

          From what I could see, there no actual good-faith requests from people who genuinely cared about /TIHI and wanted to moderate it well and diligently. And like, who’s surprised? It’s a huge subreddit without a concrete community core, it’s more of a content category. I don’t think anyone except the mods cared about the community itself, because there barely was one.

          That’s the same issue they’re running into with the other large subs. They’re too huge and too general and everyone is just another face in the crowd, so there are very few people who care about that specific space in the way that makes for good volunteer moderators - in most cases, when those people existed for those communities, they were already recruited into the old mod team.

          And all the people who want to mod are either activists for the protest, the sort of power-hungry weirdos that end up as powermods, but who showed up to Reddit too late, or somebody with an axe to grind about moderation in general seeing an opportunity in the massive unmoderated subreddit.

      • BuddhaBeettle@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Im halfway tempted to start claiming demodded subs and filling them up with instructions on how to move to their kbin/lemmy alternatives.
        If they kick me out and ban me I won’t find out cause I don’t go into reddit no more.

        Edit: of course they would never give the subreddits to me, but I find the idea really funny

        • quickleft@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          this would have been a good thing to do for some of the people who deleted their accounts. the ones who had accounts which could have credibly been given subs.

    • redcalcium@c.calciumlabs.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ever since Victoria got sacked, reddit doesn’t seem to have anyone competent enough to run community relation anymore. They probably can’t figure out how to vet new mods if they were to hire some.

  • abff08f4813c@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    1 year ago

    TIHI was a fairly large sub, with almost multimilion level of subscribers. If reddit wanted to increase traffic and get more eyes on ads, they’re doing quite a terrible job of it so far.

    • infotainment@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Reddit’s stance has just been so bizarre.

      So they want people to pay to not see ads? They literally sell that as a product, Reddit Premium. Why not tie API access to premium subscriptions? It’s not even unprecedented; Spotify does this.

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          If they had come out of the gate with that being the change, I would probably have paid for Reddit premium. Now though, not a chance.

          • danbob@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            Being a cheapass, I would probably have made the switch to using their horrid app. But, it would have been my own decision to be a cheapass so I would’ve been fine using it.

            • gpage@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I can understand that line of thinking. In this instance, I think I’m w/ @bionicjoey on this one. If it was a choice of use their app or pay, I’d have paid. I refused to use New Reddit on the PC. I know folks that have gone to using the new app though (even knowing what we know now) and I guess that’s ok. Their choice and all that.

              • HandsHurtLoL@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                @gpage @danbob @bionicjoey I’ve said in other threads that I would have gladly paid $3/month (assuming that even 20% of the reddit userbase would also be willing to pay, making this subscription so cheap) to keep the lights on at reddit - and hell, maybe even turn a profit - if that had been presented as an option before all this debacle.

                But then someone replied to me scoffing about how this means not only would I be generating free content for the site, but also paying for the privilege to do so. My take is that if this created a gated online community of contributors, that’s probably fine by me.

                Now that humans are leaving by the droves, the chatter in the Fediverse is that AI bots will eventually be all that’s left on reddit and a few humans who don’t know they’re talking to bots. But if being a participating member (submissions, comments) cost money, I think it would become cost prohibitive to run bot armies on a platform like reddit.

              • wolfshadowheart@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I know folks that have gone to using the new app though (even knowing what we know now) and I guess that’s ok. Their choice and all that.

                IMO this is the reason why boycotts don’t really work in the age of the Internet. It seems like there are just so many people with access and either too apathetic to try and make change or are simply just ignorant to the situation, whatever it may be.

                • Concetta@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m so fucking tired of this line. Redefine success and you’ll find most boycotts are actually quite successful - if you include every individual who changes their habits as a success. It took almost 20 fuckin years to get reddit to where it is, to think it was gonna burn in a day is foolish. The fall of Rome (I know I’m being hyperbolic) took what, 250 years?

                • quickleft@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  boycotts have always been very difficult to pull off and fail virtually every time.

                  For pros and cons a good place to start is Rules for Radicals, published in 1971 by the great community organizer Saul Alinsky. He has many stories to illustrate but in summary writes regarding boycotts:

                  Once the battle is joined and a tactic is employed, it is important that the conflict not be carried on over too long a time. …There are many reasons of human experience arguing for this point. I cannot repeat too often that a conflict that drags on too long becomes a drag. The same universality applies for a tactic or for any other specific action.

                  Among the reasons is the simple fact that human beings can sustain an interest in a particular subject only over a limited period of time. The concentration, the emotional fervor, even the physical energy, a particular experience that is exciting, challenging, and inviting, can last just so long — this is true of the gamut of human behavior, from sex to conflict. After a period of time it becomes monotonous, repetitive, an emotional treadmill, and worse than anything else a bore. From the moment the tactician engages in conflict, his enemy is time.

                  BTW Alinsky (b.1909) wrote this book to try to stop baby boomers from being dumb and fouling everything up. I am not a huge fan of the intergenerational model of class conflict but I think it is interesting.

          • RoboRay@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I would have, as well. But that ship has sailed, even if Spaz does try to offer that up now.

      • Xeelee@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        At this point, it’s not about what is logical or sensible. Huffman would rather burn the place down than admit he was wrong.

        • brianshatchet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          He took Elon Musk as an inspiration. I am wondering if he has a narcissistic anti-liberal leanings that he just wants to make whatever he can on an IPO while destroying it in the process

      • Awwab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I still don’t get is why all these apps had to have a single api account for all users.

        • Blakerboy777@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          To my understanding it’s a somewhat reasonable approach that has its upsides and downsides. I believe Twitter apps were all designed that way back in the day as well.

        • 1Fuji2Taka3Nasubi@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          It does not make sense to me why the API charge have to be calculated by total traffic of all users of an app either. I’ve decided to think it is just an excuse to get rid of third party apps until convinced otherwise.

          • brianshatchet@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            It was to make pay-to-play “big deals” with supposed app developers, I imagine. Maybe they were hoping to get a quantifiable influx of cash

      • axtualdave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not about the ads. It’s about the telemetry you can get on user behavior from a mobile app. Reddit wants to leverage that as part of its ad sales package.

        • derf82@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bingo. TARGETED ads is where the money is. They need the app to collect data. This is about selling your data.

    • Kichae@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      Once you have enough of it to live a comfortable life, money just becomes about power. So, what we have is some spoiled rich asshole who is used to having influence and power being shown that most of that was a gift. That gift has been recinded, and so the only control he has left is money.

      He’s spending some of Reddit’s current and future earnings on stepping on necks. Because that’s what the cash was going to be used for, in one way or another, anyway.

        • wolfshadowheart@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was more than a sub to meme on things you/to dislike, it was more like Oh Gosh Why Would This Exist Thanks I Hate It!

          Have you ever imagined a bird with teeth? What about a gif of a needle going into an eye? Or maybe a nice chocolate milkshake in a butt-oriented sex toy.

          Why do these things exist? Thanks, I hate it.

      • meat_popsicle@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        But I thought millions of people depended on the communities involved and that’s why they had to reopen.

        Doesn’t banning the community just fully go against their stated reasoning?

        • kobra@readit.buzz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Like most things that frustrate me, it seems logic has flown out the window in this situation. At least from Reddit’s perspective. I cannot fathom how they could mess this up so badly. Could you imagine if they would have given 12 months notice and piped API access behind Reddit Premium of some sort? They would have raked in the money.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We are under no obligation to pretend that’s not a tissue-paper thin disguise for getting the moderators to act how Reddit wants here.

    • nameless_prole@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      And who are they going to have take over mod responsibilities (for free) in all of these communities at once? This is why mods need to call their bluff and force them to try to replace them.

      • DBT@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Saw someone complaining about the protest in a thread where the top mod was offering up the sub to whoever wanted it. I suggested they (person complaining) go ahead and step up and ask to be a mod. They replied something like, “I don’t wanna be an E-jannie…[blah blah].”

        These people assume that there’s plenty of other people who will step-up and take over. We’ll see I guess.

        • Lells@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Whenever people say “Somebody should do something!” they very rarely ever add “and the somebody is me”

      • AshDene@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I expected:

        Randos asking for it on /r/redditrequest

        And if that didn’t work out poorly paid workers in some cheap country somewhere, like facebook does.

    • JasSmith@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah this is the dumbest move possible. I can only assume they’re trying to scare other mods into alignment because they can’t replace the moderators effectively. Well, I’ll cheers to their stupidity!

    • Zyansheep@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who they gonna replace them with? Paid employees? That’d go against their whole business model! XD

    • utopianfiat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “We’ll replace you with loyal moderators” has always been an empty threat. You don’t just find people willing to take the responsibility of moderating a 100k+ user sub on the street.

  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    I personally never browsed TIHI. It was always one of those where linking it was more of a meme than actually browsing it in my mind. Similar to how a lot of people would comment “/r/unexpectedjohnmulaney” but very few people were actually subbed to /r/unexpectedjohnmulaney. Because who the heck wants a bunch of pictures of comments referencing John Mulaney jokes in their feed? It’s the old “subreddits as hashtags” bit.

    All that being said, it sucks because I know TIHI actually had more of a community than most “hashtaggy” subreddits. My understanding is it was a bit like a blend of ATBGE, MildlyInfuriating, CursedImages, or DIWhy.

    Reddit is killing real communities, and killing their own history in the process. All those comments throughout the ages linking “/r/TIHI” now link to a dead sub. As much as I may have found those comments annoying, there were people out there who would click that link and go browse or maybe even subscribe to TIHI as a result of those comments.

    • Lohrun@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s only a matter of time until more subs start meeting the same fate. I’m glad to have found a new platform to move to. After reading the posts from the Apollo dev, it seemed like the writing was on the wall about Reddit

    • Chetzemoka@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The thing about TIHI, interestingasfuck, SLPT are that they regularly made r/all. Content hitting the front page means views for Reddit. So it’s less about the sub’s specific userbase, and more that those “main” subs have broad user appeal that brings people to Reddit in the first place.

      And currently they’re all shuttered. Which means less content on r/all, which decreases the general audience appeal of Reddit.

      Quality management 👍

    • HandsHurtLoL@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess we will start to see an uptick of “r/subsIfellfor” posts after more closures in light of how frequently the subreddit-as-hashtag but was being used.

  • zlatiah@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So having all the mods quit is actually a viable way to protest? (writes down notes)

  • Lells@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reddit: You can’t be private, people need to see the content, reopen or else!
    TIHI: No.
    Reddit: Fine, mods are gone and we’ve reopened the community. People who want to be mods speak up
    Crickets: Cricket noises
    Reddit: This sub is unmoderated, so it’s now banned so nobody can see it

    So… Reddit just reclosed the sub they said MUST be open.

    Sound logic. Real class act.

    • RoboRay@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We should all message the admins demanding the closed sub be reopened to stop the protests.

      Maybe we can get an infinite loop going.

  • pizza_rolls@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s funny that in response to this people are STILL insisting that it’s easy to find new mods. TIHI, interestingasfuck, and shittylifeprotips have been closed for over a week because they have no mods. Before TIHI mods got banned, they offered multiple users complaining the option to take over moderating the sub and they said no.

    How does any of this point to it being easy to replace mods? Delusional

    • explodingkitchen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      You would think that Reddit would have put some new mods in there right away (even if those “new mods” were just socks being staffed by Reddit employees) to put pressure on other subreddits.

      • killernova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s hard to do when you’re not profitable lol and with reddit users/creators leaving en masse, I don’t see reddit ever being profitable since those are the same people that made the site what it was, not reddit employees.

        Oh well too bad, but the fediverse is interesting and it has potential to be better than reddit could ever dream of being, without a single monolith able to destroy it. Decentralization is the future of the internet.

  • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    In for a penny, in for a pound I guess.

    I didn’t think Spez would literally drive his platform to ashes, I thought there was a middle ground, but nope he is going straight to the logical conclusion to all this.

  • aussiematt@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    What was r/TIHI? I can’t get to the reddit site anymore, but even if I could, it probably wouldn’t be very enlightening if the sub is already deleted…

    • May@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Idk if youve ever seen the bagel made of semi solid pasta and sauce that had a bite out of it? I think that was in TIHI once. Im gonna try and find it and link it.

      Edit: this is the google image result. U can see is from that subreddit but also posted other places.

    • Lohrun@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was banned when the post was made, it appears that it has switched to private. Haven’t seen any public update about what changed