• Eggyhead@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m not going to lie: I would own a Quest 3 already if it didn’t have Meta all over it.

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Saaame and I have an index and a WMR kit hahaha. But in my house, no Facebook hardware or code on any machines.

        …I miss beat saber. I’ve been too lazy lately but I have all the parts I need for a quarantined beat saber computer.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s how I feel about it. I don’t know if I would buy one but independence from Facebook is a prerequisite. Can these even be used without logging in?

        • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes, I have no facebook account. It hasn’t been a problem. Other than the logo on the headset, I haven’t seen any other downside to it being a meta ptoduct. The money they have put in to make sure they are and remain ahead of everyone else for tech means that until there is an actual downside, I pretty much have to use their headsets. But I will have no trouble jumping ship if there ever is a downside, or if anyone else even comes close to catching up.

          • Eggyhead@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            They’ve sunk ungodly amounts of cash to create unrealistic expectations for the VR market. Nobody can compete for the low end, and there’s no way meta is profiting, so what’s their end game?

            • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Presumably, they want to get everyone used to their environment so that when their hardware lead doesn’t mean as much in the future, there will be hesitation to leave. We know they aren’t currently doing anything untoward as there is plenty of overlap between paranoid tech experts and people interested in pioneering new tech. Can’t hide from them. The software and network traffic has been thouroughly vetted and everything is so far doing exactly what it would need to or purports to do.

              As long as you go into it knowing you will be changing platforms at some point in the future and hedge all software purchases against that in your mind, the only remaining downside is whether you can stomache giving them your money.

              And if that ever changes, it won’t go hidden.

              There is also something to be said for the fact that everyone in the Meta community see VR as thriving and growing, and everyone that is outside of it sees VR as stagnating or shrinking. So their money is doing that too presumably.

              Their ultimate main goal is also, of course, marrying the tech from VR headsets to the tech from AR glasses. Which will be a true ubiquitous product. Being the first one there will be a huge pay day.