• Brewchin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      EDIT: Ignore my blind confidence. CAD is (mostly) broken in recent FF versions. (See ivn’s reply to this post).

      Consent-o-Matic with Cookie Auto Delete and Firefox’s Multi-Account Container tabs covers it all nicely for me.

      Cookie banners get handled, cookies I don’t explicitly want to keep automatically disappear when I leave the site/close the tab, and those I do want to keep can be given their own containers to keep them separated.

      • ivn@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        1 month ago

        Cookie autodelete doesn’t work with strict mode and you should use strict mode. Just drop it.

        You don’t need an extension to auto remove cookies with Firefox.

        • Brewchin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 month ago

          You’re right. I’ll be damned. That’ll teach me to set-and-forget then not keep up with changes to Firefox and their effects on extensions. Thanks for the heads up.

          • ivn@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            Here’s how to auto-delete cookies without an extension: https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/blob/128.0/user.js#L669

            Set privacy.sanitize.sanitizeOnShutdown and privacy.clearOnShutdown_v2.cookiesAndStorage (I don’t know if privacy.clearOnShutdown.cookies is still needed) to true. To allow a website to keep cookies do CTRL+I on the address bar then check “Set cookie” in the Permissions tab.

    • Tux@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I use uBlock Origin’s picker mode instead. It lets you select which element you want block. It works on other annoying notices, popus and annoying stuff not just cookie notices

    • penquin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s insane how big a fight we have to put to JUST surf the damn Internet.

      • ivn@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        1 month ago

        Because it doesn’t bring anything more than Firefox in strict mode and uBlock Origin.

          • ivn@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 month ago

            Not exactly.

            uBlock Origin blocks the widgets (with the “EasyList – Social Widgets” blocklist, I don’t remember if it’s on by default). As would any other blocklist based blocked do like Privacy Badger, uBO is just better.

            FF’s strict mode has something called Total Cookie Protection that makes it so Facebook widget on site A cannot read the cookie dropped by the Fackebook widget on site B. It isolate 3rd party cookies for each website.

      • ivn@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, use an email relay service like Firefox Relay, SimpleLogin, the one from Proton if you have an account with them (that’s SimpleLogin behind)…

        You can create email aliases, that will relay the email to your main address. Create a new alias for each website so they can’t use your email address to correlate your identity and you can close it anytime, you can even configure an alias to only allow a set amount of messages and auto-close afterward.

      • Veloxization@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Addy.io gives you email aliases as not to expose your actual email address. Everything gets funnelled into a single inbox of your choosing still. And the great thing is that if you use a unique email alias for all services, you know instantly who leaked your email address if you start getting spam. :D

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Don’t give out your email to spammers. Most legitimate businesses might send quite a lot of mail, but it’s very often easy to unsubscribe so do that.

        • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Don’t give out your email to spammers

          No shit Sherlock. The real cause of spammers getting your email is through data breaches. The only thing you can do about that is not use your personal mail address for every single website you create an account for.

      • ivn@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t see its usefulness, uBlock Origin’s “Cookie Notices” list does the same thing.

        For consent forms consent-o-matic is better, IDCAC / ISDCAC was not created for this.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          doesn’t consent o matic just accept cookies when it doesn’t know how to reject them?

          • ivn@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Consent-o-matic is about consent forms, so it’ll fill the consent forms giving, by default, the least consent possible. If it doesn’t know how to handle a form it’ll just not auto-fill it so you’ll have to do it yourself. It’s not just about cookies, they are just one common way to acquire the data. IDCAC will just hide the form, because it was made to hide cookie notices and later extended to do the same for consent forms. According to the law not filling the form, not giving explicit consent, is like refusing it.

            Anyway, none of these extension touch cookies directly, they are only about notice and consent forms. It’s up to the website to act accordingly. And none of this will do anything about necessary cookies, or more precisely, about any data deemed necessary, however it’s collected.

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It looks like bypass paywalls clean was actually taken down recently. Apparently mozzila recieved a copyright claim and it was taken down as a normal part of that process :/

      • fin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Why would someone use that instead of uBlock origin cookie filter?

        Not using the addon, but I simply didn’t know uBlock can do that.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh yeah, I gotta get rid of Avast, it keeps flagging things that straight up aren’t viruses, what’s a good alternative?

      • jim3692@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 month ago

        iirc Windows Defender does a decent job. However, if you are a JavaScript developer, try to add node_modules to the exceptions, unless you don’t care much about the performance hit.

        I personally have stopped running antivirus on Windows a couple years ago. Since I run most, if not all, untrusted software in VMs, I didn’t see the point of wasting performance. On the host, I only run Firefox and Steam/Epic games.

        I then moved to Linux and I have 2 GPUs; one for the host and one for VMs with games. But that’s probably a different story.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          ry to add node_modules to the exceptions, unless you don’t care much about the performance hit.

          Does windows defender go crazy constantly scanning the files or something? I have a TON of machines running automated tasks using node and any drop in CPU usage would be much appreciated.

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 month ago

    IDCAC should not be on this list since it was compromised, ABP-style. consent-o-matic is probably better but the most direct replacement is “I Still Don’t Care About Cookies”.

    • sp6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      Doesn’t the “EasyList/uBO – Cookie Notices” filter in uBlock’s settings do the same thing as IDCAC / consent-o-matic?

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        iI think consentomatic scripts the opt-out interaction. idcac probably just hides the popup.

      • ivn@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Cookie notices and consent forms are two different things. The first comes from the ePrivacy Directive while the second comes from the GDPR. Consent forms are not only about cookies, the law doesn’t even specify cookies and it’s often using confusing phrasing (like “allow to use personal data collected through cookies or other means”).

    • ziggurat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sponsorblock to auto skip sponsor segments, or even non music parts of music on YouTube. Or interaction reminders, or end credits, etc can make it a little bit how you want it

    • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      I use uBlock Origin on Firefox and I’ve never even seen the semblance of an ad.

      Are you using Chrome, and have they implemented V3, yet?

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    ublock origin has a cookie notice and nag filter that removes those.

    go into the settings and turn on the annoyance filters, they are awesome.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Also FWIW you should care about cookies. That said, I use that filter in UBO but I’m wondering if using it is the same as hitting “reject all” or “accept all”? Does it even matter if you’re using Firefox and thus isolating cookies regardless?

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        My understanding is that most people use an extension to dismiss the cookie dialog if they’re also deleting third party cookies, either with an extension/or a browser feature

        Though there is also consent-o-matic which is supposed to automatically decline all the cookies you can. Folks in this thread mentioned it, so now I’m giving that a try :)

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        AFAIK as long as you don’t click ‘accept’, you are good. I believe thats why they make these notices so obnoxious.

  • cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 month ago

    Go into uBO settings and then filters and enable all the non-language filters. You won’t need privacy badger or that cookie addon anymore.

  • AllToRuleThemOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Another recommendation for YT:

    SponsorBlock

    It is Community-Based. Ppl (like you) mark timecodes from sponsor ads and if toggled on those will be skipped. You can whitelist channels as well if you want to.

    150% better YT-experience!

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      If I’m going to see an ad, I do prefer sponsor ads over the injected YT ads. At least I can hope the content creators are getting paid directly for the ad.

  • Jestzer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m not saying my setup is any better, but it currently looks like this:

    • Firefox
    • UBO
    • SponsorBlock
    • Return YouTube Dislikes
    • DeArrow
    • Archive.ph

    I’m open to suggestions if anybody knows any better alternatives. I’ve had mixed luck with services that filter out YouTube’s crap.

  • RandomStickman@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Be careful with using Privacy Badger and uBO together as it might get in each other’s way. I had YouTube detect me having ad block until I paused Privacy Badger for YT.