• rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Abolish patent law.

    Maybe replace it with some very strict non-extensible protection, based on time since patent registration or profit made with it, maybe something else, whichever happens earlier.

    Either that or get used to oligopoly in every area of economics affected by electronics and computers and even all scientific advancement.

    That this takes time to happen, doesn’t change the fact.

    • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Isn’t that pretty much how parents work already? They’re extensible, sure, but only up to 20 years total. Not only that but you’re forced to document it too.

        • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Certainly it could be, I would like to see some proper study done into it, but it’s probably borderline impossible.

          Conversely patents are somewhat unobtainable by the average Joe, I think I saw it costing somewhere in the region of 25-50k to patent something by the time you factor in the cost of a decent patent lawyer.

          Maybe a 10-15 year patent period with lower barrier to entry would be a good thing.

    • Bob Smith@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      No argument here. It is insane to me that if I want content that isn’t locked into a particular ecosystem, I have to seek out public domain material or pick from the small subset of books that is sold DRM-free books in an open format. For anything else, money can’t buy flexibility. For most books, the only options for digital are accepting the DRM, waiting until copyright expires (good luck with that one), or privateering with out a letter of marque.