Something is wrong with this split-screen picture. On one side, former president Donald Trump rants about mass deportations and claims to have stopped “wars with France,” after being described by his longest-serving White House chief of staff as a literal fascist. On the other side, commentators debate whether Vice President Kamala Harris performed well enough at a CNN town hall to “close the deal.”

Let’s review: First, Harris was criticized for not doing enough interviews — so she did multiple interviews, including with nontraditional media. She was criticized for not doing hostile interviews — so she went toe to toe with Bret Baier of Fox News. She was criticized as being comfortable only at scripted rallies — so she did unscripted events, such as the town hall on Wednesday. Along the way, she wiped the floor with Trump during their one televised debate.

Trump, meanwhile, stands before his MAGA crowds and spews nonstop lies, ominous threats, impossible promises and utter gibberish. His rhetoric is dismissed, or looked past, without first being interrogated.

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    I can only speak for myself, as a Leftist I dont expect perfection but I have a few quite simple things that I would want from a presidency that I dont think are unreasonable. I want an end to the funding of genocide, an end to US imperalism, an end to the military (at least offensive military), an end to fossil fuels, an improved immigration system, decreased taxes for the workers, less inflation, ranked choice voting, enforced civil rights for women and trans people, a better healthcare system, no corporate bailouts or funding. Kamala might support some or none of those things and I wouldn’t know because she doesn’t make her policy positions clear. I think that if she was just transparent and honest then more people would vote for her, as of now her campaign website contains only a few very vague positions.

      • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        the 60% of Americans that are paycheck to paycheck will starve to death, and the 39% who have savings will get poorer. The top 1% will get richer either way and none of this matters to them. Its just a matter of how fast their wealth increases.

        They probably would be fine if half of us starved, as long as we dont block the higjways with our bodies, and dont stink up the place.

      • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Some of them may require a tad bit of effort (which yes I get expecting a Democrat to do their job is like asking for a million dollars) but she could at least not fund genocides. I think that’s a good bare minimum