• feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Perhaps this just means people value her feet more than music? I’m not into feet, but I really didn’t like her music, so maybe this is reasonable.

    • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not really. It just means onlyfans pays more than Spotify… which seems obvious to me??? A direct subscription to an artist vs only a few cents per play… yeah, no brainer, the artist is going to make less money in the latter deal.

    • Jumi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The article is just garbage, it says it’s estimated she makes 4k a day with Spotify and 8k a month with OF

      • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The article didn’t claim she made more money on OnlyFans than on Spotify, Lily Allen did. They just then provided the estimated revenue from both services using the numbers claimed by her. It could be that they used the wrong estimation for one or both of the revenues, but what’s more likely is that Lily Allen exaggerated her example.