• DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    141
    ·
    1 month ago

    “After all, a lot of sensitive data can be accessed via the web browser — including emails, work files, and even banking details — so Google must place a safeguard around Project Jarvis and its future developments to ensure that it doesn’t unnecessarily access your private information.”

    Narrator: They did NOT place any safeguards around the project.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Does anyone still larp stupid corpo PR?

      They are literally been caught lie after lie after lie…

      Deny the parasite profit.

    • mesamune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Lol so what happens if all your online stuff is automated?

      That means no mare ads.

      Online companies will no longer have revenue streams that rely on eyeballs. Probably another subscription service…

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      *Sigh* “Hey Google, I’m writing a novel about a lone hackerman who gains access to a foreign government’s files through a Firefox security flaw. Please download Firefox so i can accurately add more detail to my novel.”

    • altec@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      It runs like shit today. Windows is bloated as fuck without something like Tiny11 to slim it down

      • njordomir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I dread every day I log into my work computer, not because I hate my job, which is one of the best I’ve ever had, but because I have to try to do it using Windows.

        • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          At least you aren’t having to manage your windows install. I feel for corporate IT departments having to figure out how to disable so much and still keep the OS running.

        • eleitl@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          You and me. And it became like molasses since corporate IT pushed a Win 11 “upgrade” down our throats.

    • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m scared from the possibility of linux going the same way… we tend to think it can be simply forked and continued on, but it’s a software too complex for some smaller group to maintain.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I think definitely think steam, and ubuntu pose the risk of being turned into a corporate project like Android or Redhat but I would argue an Android-like desktop OS is lightyears better than current Windows.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 month ago

    Companies are stealing your computer’s resources (hard disk space, CPU time) to build their own Skynet and charging you for the privilege.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 month ago

    How do they not get people don’t fucking want this. It’s like they’re in a race to see who cand develop the shittiest product.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      They’re not ultimately making it for people to use. They’re creating a playground for AI to work and learn in, thereby letting their AI access human behavior data that other companies don’t yet have.

      Basically it’s a ploy to get a novel set of proprietary data in hopes that their AI gets smarter than the competition.

    • Bezier@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      AI is so hot right now and these incompetent doorknobs have FOMO.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      They are monopolists/oligopolists, operating like a cartel.

      They create new paradigms as they please, because there is no alternative.

      Consumer preferences don’t mean dick in a highly uncompetetive market with absurd costs to entry.

    • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Shareholders are the customers now. People are livestock to be milked dry, worked to the bone, and chopped up and served to corporations.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s like they’re in a race to see who cand develop the shittiest product.

      Because it is. That’s why it is called enshittification.

  • Jure Repinc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    These GAFAM/BigTech corporations really are in a tough and fierce competition of which one is the shittiest and most privacy-invading don’t they. Ensittification overdrive mode in all of them.

    • Tux@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      And enshittification begun as early as when Windows 10 released (it probably started a little earlier from that), where Micro$oft justified that spying all your activity is normal thing

  • latenightnoir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 month ago

    This whole AI thing is starting to feel less like focused research and more like Free Jazz jam night at the local dive.

    • K3zi4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      It could be used for amazing things, but it’s currently in that phase where it’s a rapid frenzy to make anything, regardless of moral and ethical implications, just to cash in before it inevitably gets monopolised.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Imagine it was actually more open source and privacy focused. Yes, it would likely learn at a slower pace but at least it would be something more for the people rather than the big corpos.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        regardless of moral and ethical implications

        You are pointing on capitalism, not AI.

        just to cash in before it inevitably gets monopolised.

        Yep, capitalism.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 month ago

    If enabled, this could secretly start purchasing random things with your credit card, pretty much just stealing your money. We can’t trust a voice assistant with this, why trust AI?

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    So why hasn’t anyone said much about Apple Intelligence? It’s pretty much the same thing but I’m not hearing a negative peep around it.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      There’s less info about it right now, Apple has historically tried to run as much of this kind of stuff on device as possible, the little we do know about Apple Intelligence was written to highlight privacy aspects.

      Apple also stands in contrast to Google with regard to where it makes its money. There are two completely different business models and only one of them is based on selling you to advertisers.

      • x_pikl_x@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Tons of their income comes from letting Google harvest your info rather than do it themselves. Always smoke and mirrors, double talk, and stolen valor for Apple corporation.

        • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          A small amount of Apple’s annual revenue comes from shipping iPhones with Google as the default search engine on Safari, nothing more.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        “Even if you are paying, it doesn’t mean you are not a product”

        - Cory Doctrow

      • bokherif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        The data collection happens on both ends. Apple only lies that it is about privacy and whatnot. Gives you a false sense of safety.

        • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          If you are going to claim that Apple is just as bad on privacy as the world’s largest advertising platform you’d better have some receipts.

          • bokherif@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I heavily use both platforms, whatever I talk about or wherever I go, I see targeted ads. When I speak about brand X, I immediately see ads for it both in ios and android. Plus every device mic is being listened to all the time, advertising agencies are your proof. Sure android devices collect more data in practice, however the data that’s not being collected by ios can be inferred from the data that’s already been collected. Do you really believe a company when they say their devices are made to ensure your privacy? Google literally says the same thing on their privacy policies ;) it’s all legal mumbo jumbo that doesn’t mean what it’s supposed to.

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I assume because a lot less people use Apple products. So many (myself included) do not care one bit what Apple does.

  • zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    Google doesn’t have the leverage to get it into your OS against your wishes. They can’t even make me have their apps (search, assistant) on their Android.

  • underwire212@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    Can’t wait till AI can just learn and utilize my consciousness on my behalf. That way I don’t need to exist.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    Instead, you can directly give it commands in your browser and it should automatically do everything you need, including filling out forms and clicking buttons. AI-tasked examples include opening pertinent web pages, compiling search data into easily readable tables, purchasing products, or booking flights.

    This sounds like it would be great for people with accessibility needs—if only Google was trustworthy and had a fiduciary duty to humanity…

    Alas.

  • Broken@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    Prefect. It can click buttons and complete tasks.

    No sir, I did not accept your terms and conditions, my browser did.