• treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    In gambling, the house always wins, by extracting value from the players. In stock trading, the players (capitalists) collectively always win, by extracting value from labor, technological growth, and natural resources. These are not the same picture.

    Not all gambling requires a casino/house.

    • fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Even in a home poker game, it is not possible for all the players to go home having made a profit, whereas that is very possible in the stock market due to growth, labor, and natural resources.

      (The coal miner who gets a wage and black lung is not a player in the stock market. Neither is the sun, which provides free energy to agribusiness.)

      • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes, general investing is not zero sum, however many methods of advanced trading are. Options trading, which is prominent and easy to access on Robinhood, is much closer to gambling (and is treated that way by many users) and is zero sum.

        Most active trading strategies require successfully arbitraging, or extracting inefficiencies out of the market, and you can’t do either of those things without someone else losing money.

        Passive investment is investing in the companies that underlay the market, active trading is extracting value out of the market itself.