• @quicken@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    12 hours ago

    It’s always the AI. We all know they’re pushing the AI button before even reading the rest of the label!

  • @bamfic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44 hours ago

    I remember 10 years or so ago working with a guy who was trying to sell me on the wonders of Eclipse. “It writes all this boilerplate for you!” I was more interested in writing in languages that were less shit and required less boilerplate.

  • @ddplf
    link
    45 hours ago

    I don’t get it, what’s so bad about boilerplate?

  • @taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    89 hours ago

    It’s not really that hard to implement AI as far as I can tell, even if it does produce garbage results. Any CEO that thinks otherwise is getting bamboozled.

    Not that I’m defending AI, boilerplate is still boilerplate and a crappier product is a crappier product. But they’ll take that trade off anyway which is why heads need to roll, lol

  • @AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    3612 hours ago

    It’s the new “promotion machine.” The first manager: “I saved this company x dollars using AI, promote me.” The new manager: “I increased productivity by x percent getting rid of AI, promote me.” Repeat.

  • @bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2413 hours ago

    C) Write a highly specific, custom-tailored boilerplate generator that does 80% of the work and needs only a day or two to implement.

    • @ddplf
      link
      44 hours ago

      This sounds just extremely dumb to me, as in “do something manually for 2 minutes or spend 2 days automating it”

      Also, DRY in 90% of the cases is a sham