• masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Yes, it’s this little thing called context, thresholds, and relative magnitude.

    If your brain is only evolved to process numbers up to a hundred or two, then everything 10000+ is similarly processed through abstractions rather than your brain being able to directly comprehend and compare them.

    If instead of asking a guffawing question, you actually tried to point out why my reasoning was flawed, you may have realized those basic aspects of how language and reasoning work on your own.

    • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Relative magnitude, really? You’re undermining your own point by not using a representative example and then calling your example a relative magnitude to the others.

      210 billion to 250 billion = ~19% increase

      75,000 to a million = ~12,000% increase

      Nanometer to micrometer = ~99,000% increase

      Nanometer to 5 millimeters = ~499,999,900% increase

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Notice how all of those numbers are substantially larger or smaller, by many orders of magnitude, than a couple of hundred.

        Are you intentionally trying to avoid understanding what I’m writing?

        • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          210 billion is not substantially smaller than 250 billion. Are you intentionally trying to miss the point?