fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 25 days agolab toysmander.xyzimagemessage-square76fedilinkarrow-up1846arrow-down111
arrow-up1835arrow-down1imagelab toysmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 25 days agomessage-square76fedilink
minus-squareDragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·25 days agoNo, counting with fingers is bad. Count with phalanges instead. It’s more efficient
minus-squareCrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·25 days agoJust be sure to do it in binary. You gotta squeeze all of the value out of those phalanges.
minus-squareDragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·25 days agoThat’s impossible, because it would require tracking each digit at once. Counting in binary is kind of possible with fingers, but not with phalanges.
No, counting with fingers is bad. Count with phalanges instead. It’s more efficient
Just be sure to do it in binary. You gotta squeeze all of the value out of those phalanges.
That’s impossible, because it would require tracking each digit at once. Counting in binary is kind of possible with fingers, but not with phalanges.