Summary

Gender bias played a significant role in Kamala Harris’s defeat, with many voters—often women—expressing doubts about whether “America is ready for a female president.”

Some said they “couldn’t see her in the chair,” or questioned if a woman could lead, with one even remarking, “you don’t see women building skyscrapers.” Though some voters were open to persuasion, this often became a red line.

Oliver Hall, a Harris campaign volunteer, found that economic concerns, particularly inflation, also drove voters to Donald Trump, despite low unemployment and wage growth touted by Democrats.

Harris was viewed in conflicting ways, seen as both too tough and too lenient on crime, as well as ineffective yet overly tied to Biden’s administration.

Ultimately, Hall believes that Trump’s unique appeal and influence overshadowed Harris’s campaign efforts.

  • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    23 days ago

    “I can only think of one occasion when someone mentioned stricter taxes on billionaires or any similar policies. The atrocities being committed by Israel in Gaza only came up six times in more than 1,000 calls. The idea that Harris was not leftwing enough seems false”

    The problem with this anecdotal evidence is that the campaign almost certainly put this kid to work only calling likely Republican voters… An absolute waste of time, and of course these are the things those shit brains would be saying… If he had been put to work calling people who had voted for Biden but were less likely to show up this time he would have gotten a lot more genocide, she’s not progressive enough, and tax the rich messages

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 days ago

      Exactly. On the fuckin head.

      Just goes to show how deeply-run this “focus on courting the fascists” was in the campaign.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      22 days ago

      On ok… So that’s anecdotal evidence, but not your terminally online ass seeing everyone on Lemmy upset with it and assuming that was any indication of real world demographics?

      Got it.

      • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        Nah, we’ll have to wait for someone to poll the people who showed up last time but sat it out this time to know for real why they did it