• Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          Years ago I concluded (wrongly or rightly) that most people are neutral, a small handfull are actually good people (willing to sacrifice their personal benefit for people they don’t know with no expectation of gaining from it, even in the form of social approval) and a small handful are assholes, but the assholes do such a disproportionate amount of damage that they end up having a massive impact on everybody else.

            • Aceticon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              17 days ago

              Well, that’s the second part of my theory but I didn’t went into it to avoid muddling the point I was making:

              • I think the “neutral” majority shift more to one side or the other depending on who dominates society and the main sources of culture and information in it.

              So in present “Greed is good” (very much a Sociopath slogan) times with mainstream media and a large section of the Culture production and distribution (in the form of TV, but also TV Show and Movie making) in the hands of extremelly wealthy people and when those we are told we should look up to are people like Musk (well, him specifically maybe not anymore) and Bezos, the “neutral” majority has shifted significantly towards the asshole side of things.

              The World would be a lot different if our “heroes” were Scientists and Environmentalists.

              • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                17 days ago

                yes and if human well being was the goal over profit. profit benefits the few, and it’s an amoral driving force. unfortunately it’s been conflated with freedom and fairness.

      • uhmbah@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        [after playing out all possible outcomes for Global Thermonuclear War]

        Joshua: Greetings, Professor Falken. Stephen Falken: Hello, Joshua. Joshua: A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess?

  • LostXOR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    18 days ago

    Soon all the scammers will be replaced with AI, and we’ll just have AIs calling AIs all day long.

  • Dasnap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    18 days ago

    I first assumed this was a Kitboga project or something, but the fact that it’s a mobile provider doing it themselves is amazing.

    • Treasure@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      18 days ago

      I am a Patreon supporter of Jim Browning. Incidentally, I got this email today:

      At last, I can reveal something I’ve been working on in conjunction with a major UK cellphone operator, O2. Meet dAIsy. Daisy is an AI bot who answers scam phone calls. Thanks to the mobile operator who can fingerprint scam phone calls via the calling pattern, source, sequence of calls and other markers, scam calls are being diverted to an AI bot who has been trained to keep the scammers on the phone as long as possible.

      This is my recording of a Zoom interview I had today with Channel 5 news in the UK where you can see dAIsy in action.

      I will continue to train dAIsy with real scam phone calls. When we perfect her, the aim is to work with other cell and landline operators to divert scam calls to thousands of instances of dAIsy. […]

      So you’re not wrong about this being a project of some anti-scam YouTuber, you just guessed the wrong one. ^^

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 days ago

      I wonder if mobile providers are still getting paid for long distance calls. Because if they are, they have a perverse incentive to keep scammers on the line.

      Which, in this isolated case, I’m okay with.

      • Benjaben@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        But don’t you see?! Those increased expenses will just be passed along to the scammed!

        (No actual point here just thought it was funny to compare to the logic we hear for not punishing other abusive businesses)

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    18 days ago

    Plot twist: its just an AI impersonating a broke college student selling ceramic knives to an AI impersonating a broke grandma.

    This is now 80% of your monthly minutes. Bullshit AI talking to bullshit AI. No wonder this was created by a phone company.

  • CyprianSceptre@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    18 days ago

    To be fair, O2 has a massive issue with scammers and they need to do something about it. I switched to O2 about a year ago, keeping my old number. I’d rarely get scam calls or texts before I switched but since I’ve been with o2, I get 5-10 calls a week. Particularly annoying because I have to answer my phone due to my job

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    I used the rot to destroy the rot

    Real talk though I love these applications of AI and will enthusiastically support them