• frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    16 days ago

    How do you communicate effectively to someone with their fingers in their ears screaming nananananananana? Please advise, oh political oracle.

    • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      You go on Joe Rogan for one. Kamala ran the last presidential campaign that will ever rely so heavily on the legacy media apparatus. This whole cycle proved that they are only broadcasting to themselves and real people are elsewhere on podcasts, twitter and YT.

    • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      With all the fucking TV ads and mailers the campaign spent billions on. If the average voters is just covering there ears then why spend so much on advertising or why even campaign at all? Yeah some people are like that but they’re deep in the maga cult, there’s still a large amount of people open to both sides if the messaging is right that decided this election. Harris’ messaging didn’t work though.

      • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        I mean the marketing was effective. A lot of people including Donald trump thought he was going to lose. Just not effective at getting people who support Biden to get off their ass.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      16 days ago

      Trump seemed to get through.

      Democrats are forbidden by their patrons from using too much populist rhetoric. That’s the number one reason why they fail to connect with what has become a very populist country, thanks to decades of wealth transfer to the top.

      Bernie used populist language and the Democratic establishment pulled out all the stops to give us “anybody but Bernie”. Now we are living the consequences.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        So basically you lie to them and tell them what they want to hear? Stoke fear of “the others” among them to keep them scared and angry?

        Yeah, no, I’m good.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          Is that what you think Bernie does?

          People are scared and angry already. Not everyone has the financial stability you apparently do. Republicans focus that fear on the powerless. Democrats pretend it’s not there. You can’t respond to struggling families with “the economy is great!”

      • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        15 days ago

        What’s neat is that you appear to have internalized the conservative view of the Democratic machine in this country. They are completely incompetent…but also such shadowy and powerful figures they control what everyone says and does and control who votes for who…except when it comes to republicans who these scary shadowy figures are unable to competently manipulate ever…

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          If you want to argue today that the Democrats aren’t failures at fighting Republicans and specifically Trump, I would love to hear that argument.

          There was nothing “shadowy” about the “anybody but Bernie” effort in 2020. They might have preferred it to be quieter, but I think just about every relevant detail of that scheme leaked, and it played out quite transparently. Are you arguing that it didn’t happen?

          It’s not as much about competence as it is about perspective. The Democratic establishment is somewhat competently running strategies that are well suited for the 90s but completely out of touch with where voters are today.

    • yogi_pogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      16 days ago

      Ah yes, now that you made fun of the prior commenter, we have convinced the world and now Kamala is president?

      Bernie is fucking right.

        • yogi_pogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          16 days ago

          You lumped a huge percentage of people as putting their fingers in their ears.

          Maga is going to vote maga. And there’s a huge chunk that didn’t vote or were surprised Biden dropped out. Those folks didn’t put their fingers in their ears. Like Bernie said, they were ignored.

          • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            People who were surprised 5 months after Biden dropped out didn’t have their fingers in their ears in your version of the world? I think you and I mean very different things by that phrase.

      • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        Check out leopards eating faces for the next few years…those people, whether it’s moms surprised the education department is again going to punish their kids, Muslims surprised trump hates Muslims and wants them eradicated, EV company owners who think being allowed to support means being part of the narcissists inner circle, Latinos shocked that their friends or family members there illegally won’t get special protections no matter how many times McCarthy rears his head.

        • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          “EV company owners” aside, most voters in this country just want something to change, and they’ll vote for whoever promises the most of it. Harris’ campaign didn’t do anything nor promise anything that resonated, and practically everything she said ended up morphing into her highly-rehearsed stump speech. No talks about Medicare for All, no talks about the minimum wage, no talks about legalizing weed, and kowtowing to the right on border policy by accepting the ‘crisis’ framing. Harris also failed to address the situation in Gaza in a way that mattered, even though it was a major issue for undecided voters in key states like Michigan. Over 100,000 Democratic primary voters there cast an uncommitted vote over Biden’s handling of Israel and Gaza, which is more than the margin by which she lost the state.

          The right took advantage of this. An EV company owner paid a PAC to distribute ostensibly pro-Harris pamphlets in predominantly Arab neighborhoods in Michigan saying she was the most pro-Israel candidate on the ballot. The right helped put abortion rights directly on the state ballots as propositions, letting people believe the choice could be separated from who they voted for (see Florida, where the proposition lost at 57% support when the state voted roughly the same percentage for ol Don).

          Harris had a potential base on the progressive left, but the DNC insisted on tweaking her campaign to try to win over right-moderates. That doesn’t work anymore, precisely for the “sticking fingers in ears” attitude you mentioned from right-wing voters. It’s asinine for the DNC to continue to try and appeal to them, when the median Republican voter thinks Democrats are agents of a satanic agenda. Regardless, the message the DNC seems to have gotten from Nov 5 was that they lost this election because they failed to move to the right hard enough. The ratchet effect continues.

          As a side note, I know several trumpets who would’ve voted for Sanders in 2016 were he the Democratic nominee, and would’ve voted for Walz even this election were he the main guy on the 2024 presidential ticket. Such people are not very coherent ideologically, they just want someone in who has big ideas.

          Unfortunately, it’s just not enough to be “not the other guy”, even if the other guy is a convicted felon, rapist, and just all-around a downright awful human being.

          edit: grammar and wording in a couple spots