SSTF@lemmy.world to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 1 年前It's insidiouslemmy.worldimagemessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1512arrow-down13
arrow-up1509arrow-down1imageIt's insidiouslemmy.worldSSTF@lemmy.world to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 1 年前message-square53fedilink
minus-squareDeconceptualist@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 年前It’s not TIFF. This isn’t NASA imagery. PNGs do alright on compression for photos. (at least I hope NASA hasn’t captured images of Quark)
minus-squarefractalizard@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 年前TIFF is also such a hot mess when it comes to picking the correct subformat because there are so many options for compression available, some of them FOSS, some of them proprietary. Edit: … and most of them quite dated.
minus-squarePhoenixz@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前PNG can zip but it’s lossless, joh can lose data, and the difference is very significant
It’s not TIFF. This isn’t NASA imagery. PNGs do alright on compression for photos.
(at least I hope NASA hasn’t captured images of Quark)
TIFF is also such a hot mess when it comes to picking the correct subformat because there are so many options for compression available, some of them FOSS, some of them proprietary. Edit: … and most of them quite dated.
PNG can zip but it’s lossless, joh can lose data, and the difference is very significant