The Prime Minister said that, as a middle power, Canada understands how important it is to protect the rules-based international order

Summary

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau opposed any deal letting Russia keep Ukrainian land, saying it would encourage other countries to break international rules.

Speaking to a NATO meeting, he highlighted Canada’s $19.5 billion aid to Ukraine and stressed the need to defend global stability.

Trudeau defended his plan to raise military spending to 2% of GDP by 2032 after criticism of Canada’s low defense funding.

He warned against isolating Ukraine, saying continued support is crucial to stop further global conflicts.

  • whoisearth@lemmy.caEnglish
    553·
    7 days ago

    Agree 100% we can’t rely on our rich bi-polar brother in the methlab of a house next door to protect us anymore.

    • index@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      48·
      7 days ago

      You need protection from greedy politicians and the military industry sucking in public money and fueling wars.

      • etuomaala@sopuli.xyzEnglish
        1·
        2 days ago

        Finland has a pretty absurdly strong military. It really is a waste of money. But it has this military because it shares a border with Russia. If Finland did not have such a military, it would be invaded. That is what empires do. Finland’s military does not start war; it prevents it.

        Ideally, neither side would have to waste money on this military, but until Russia gives up theirs, Finland can’t give up theirs either. Good luck convincing Russia to do that.

        Not long ago, I would have been in total agreement with you. The very idea of stealing land through invasion was so antiquated to me that I did not believe even Russia would do it until the moment their troops crossed the Ukrainian border. Now, I reluctantly am forced to conclude that not only is Russia that backward, it probably always was, and the only reason Finland has been safe all these years is because of the military that I thought was so absurd.

        • index@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          1·
          2 days ago

          If Finland did not have such a military, it would be invaded.

          That’s a speculation you are making, russia spend 20 times as much as finland does in war they wouldn’t have much problems invading finland if it was all about military strength.

          That is what empires do

          That’s true USA does the same.

          Ideally, neither side would have to waste money on this military, but until Russia gives up theirs, Finland can’t give up theirs either.

          While finland spend less than russia NATO combined spend 20 times as much as russia does in war. Do you see where your logic leads? To match USA alone russia would have to tenfold their military budget.