• RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Well yeah but we also call anything that’s like Doom a boomer shooter now. So you see, your argument is invalid * tips fedora, vanishes into Cheeto dust *

    • Sas [she/her]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I did as a kid when i didn’t know what the genre was called. But for me it was sacred like as that was what i played

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Hack’n Slay. arpg feels more like an umbrella term for any RPG with an action combat system. It’s at least how we described it back during SNES times with games like Secret of Mana, opposed to games like Final Fantasy with their turn based combat.

  • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    we will continue to call your game an action rguelike, sir. you don’t get to add a twist to a genre and then be who’s the genre

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Wait, we don’t?

    I mean, I was there when the discourse around Diablo 1 was “it’s not a real RPG, it’s mostly just Gauntlet with loot”, so “not ARPGs” and “Diablo-likes” have been in my lexicon from the ground floor.