Eh, if Diablo 3, Immortal, and 4 didn’t exist…I could see it.
Eh, if Diablo 3, Immortal, and 4 didn’t exist…I could see it.
It can hold fluids. It has been introduced as a Barrel of Nearly-Limitless Ale, before.
If you try storing the atmosphere/ocean(s) a deity might frown upon such an act.
It functions as a Titan Space (side dimension only as big as it needs to be), so yes.
An older version had it EXPEL everything inside if you broke the single item rule, but that was nerfed due to being OP as hell. Fill your barrel with near infinite daggers. Toss in a marble and convert whatever is in front of the barrel to free-floating-carbon
Singularity Barrel: Can hold an infinite amount of one type of item. You want it to hold scimitars? Sure, it’ll hold as many as you could ever want. You try to put one dagger in there? You gotta dump out all the scimitars.
Nicotine levels have been increased to compete with vapes.
Omg, like rawr x3. Do u guys like tacos!?
There has to be a point, first. It’s just the old “go woke, go broke” nonsense. It’s the recycled conservative pearl clutching that has always come in when society starts to include those ‘nasty outsiders’. (Minorities.)
Let’s say I entertain the possibility that there is a point.
->Baldur’s Gate 3. . Very ‘woke’. Amazing game.
->Concord Arguably ‘woke’. Crappy game.
Let’s go with a game that flopped and wasn’t advertised as ‘inclusive’ Anthem.
Let’s entertain this further to /really/ drive some nails into the coffin of this ‘point’.
Celeste, a game heavy with queer tones to tell the story. Great game, very popular.
So, that is why most people are walking by this with just a down vote. It’s all it really deserves, but I needed an easy win today. ~
Hope life treats you well, Peace
Mario for the SNES. First game I played that I owned, Pokémon Yellow or Super Mario 64
I’ve been meaning to get into Linux, I’ll have to solo 13 wolves another day ;(
Don’t worry everyone. Blue is exactly the same as green, but colored differently. As someone in the blue, friends with green.
A 17 year old and an 18 year old are only a year apart in maturity. It’s essentially comparable to a 17 and 16 year old. 2 years apart starts to get gray as far as morality goes. I’m against 16 and 19, but i can imagine extremely remote cases where it might be acceptable, but that is stretching my objective capabilities. 16 and 20 is too far. As you get closer to 25 and the brain is fully developed, the margins get wider.
For instance, 18 and 22? That goes back to stretching it. 19 and 23? Back to morally Grey. 20 and 24? Fine.
Ephebophelia definitions are meant to cast a wide net to protect as many people as possible. Just get over it for societies greater good.
Confirmed good boy.
Cause EA buys them and then makes them develop under the barrel of a gun
Depends on how they feel about trans people, test the waters. A subtle way is to ask a guy (or a few) role model(s) near you if they have ever thought about what it is like to be a girl.
My parents are fairly conservative, and I ran into the snag of the FIRST guy I asked was like “oh, yeah. All guys think that.” And then I just bought it for years.
Still, it is good to plant the seed.
No worries! Dunking on transphobes brings me joy. It’s a nice, easy way to enjoy my day. Like taking a walk or hugging someone.
Well, in actuality, you would socially transition. You would try out girl’s clothes, girl pronouns, maybe a different name. If you stopped, as you would have obviously done, you would just socially transition back. Life would go on.
https://www.wpath.org/ There ya go!
So what is your take on when someone with XX chromosomes experiences standard expression of FOXL-2 for part of the gestation, but stops functioning before finishing primary sexual characteristics?
How does that fit under a biological classification? Are they meant to bear children? Be a father? Will they ever be a boy? A woman?
Furthermore, are there other genes that inform your thesis to the above statements? How would their expression through developmental stages possibly affect the expressed sexual characteristics in both normal and impeded function?
“Fought and bled for some oil executive to have their number to go up”. There, fixed it for you!
I’ve consistently done everything I can to make those that society has left behind or treated poorly have some comfort. Some joy. Some happy memory of someone who was genuinely happy to help them and be fulfilled by it.
At the same time, let’s use your own argument against you. A gender studies degree? So you are aware biology and gender studies exist beyond what you are capable of understanding, and yet still refuse to accept their outcomes?
You fought for this country, showing you believe in awarding recognition based on merit. So if someone takes all the steps and jumps through all the hoops to transition to their ideal gender, shouldn’t the merit of their struggle be awarded?
TLDR: You are wrong. Easily wrong. That’s alright, I used to be wrong, too. It really f***ing sucks and I hate being wrong. That’s life. There is always more to learn and new things to experience. There’s a whole world out there, and that isn’t even counting the mysteries of space.
As a previous so-called ‘ghost engineer’, it took three people to replace me, and four months for damage control when I wasn’t there to keep things in top shape. There was documentation to keep things running, but since I wrote that documentation and “my contributions weren’t necessary foe the team’s success” Well. Why leave them?