• MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hell, I was even old enough when it was airing to think it was overrated then.

        • MudMan@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          See, that’s the real issue. I don’t have a problem with acknowledging it’s high concept, ocassionally funny and mostly easy watching.

          But everybody insisting it’s endless comedic, best-sitcom-ever brilliance is overrating it. It’s overrated.

            • DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Exactly. Seinfeld isn’t funny now because all the shows after it copied it. When Seinfeld came out, it was revolutionary. No one was doing that humor. They invented it. Now, everyone and their mother has copied them, so it’s played out. And since all these newer sitcoms had time and previous examples to improve on, they do it better, so Seinfeld looks lame by comparison. However, when I as a millennial was watching Seinfeld when it was being originally aired, I thought it was great.

            • MudMan@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              Oh, hell, no. It’s not like Seinfeld invented sitcoms, or even modern sitcoms. It’s not the Model T, it’s the Ford Escort. Maybe.

              And I’m not saying it’s unfunny, I’m saying it’s a solid 90s sitcom that for some reason people are out here saying is the Model T of sitcoms. I feel like the level of hyperbole puts the burden of proof elsewhere.

              And it’s also not a case of it now being standard, because I assure you I’ve had this opinion since it was airing. I very much was of the batch of people who flip-flopped on Family Guy, but I was in the “Seinfeld was mid” camp before anybody ever called anything “mid”.

      • boboliosisjones@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I didn’t necessarily mind it, but Jerry’s awful standup shoved in there on the other hand…

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Same goes for younger generations. Everyone old is a boomer.

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Generational labels tend to divide by arbitrary boundaries more than actually give you insightful information about something exclusive to the group.

    • abaddon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      The years for Millennials go up to 94-96, Seinfeld finished in 98. I doubt many that young would have seen it. I was born in 86 and I barely watched Seinfeld re-runs.

      • IMongoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        2 days ago

        Seinfeld was hugely syndicated. I was born in the 90s and watched tons of reruns of it. I think they played it after or before the Simpsons which my family always watched.

        • ditty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah same I watched reruns of Seinfeld every weeknight growing up from '98-05 at least if not later

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The years for Millennials go up to 94-96

        ?? What do you think millennials were doing after 1996? Did they just phase out of existence?

        I was born in 86 and I barely watched Seinfeld re-runs.

        People had Seinfeld on in my college dorm during the mid-00s. It was one of the most syndicated shows of its era. If you remember 9/11, you remember Seinfeld.

        • abaddon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I commented on someone who seemed to think that millennials wasn’t the correct generation because millennials must have grown up watching Seinfeld. Many did, but many didn’t. I know many people around my age that didn’t watch it so it’s fairly safe to assume that people who were 2-4 years old when the show ended might not have seen it, even re-runs. Remembering it and watching it enough to have an opinion on it are two different things.

      • synae[he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        I was born in 84 and have seen every episode multiple times. Except the clip shows, because once you figure out that’s what’s happening you know better next time around and skip them.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not like every millennial watched it growing up. It’s not inconceivable that there are millennials who are seeing it now for only the first time and find it offensive.

        • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          My partner is a millennial and she had never seen Seinfeld until we first watched it together a few years ago. It’s not that inconceivable to imagine not everyone grew up watching the same things as you.

          • MudMan@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            No, it’s definitely fine and possible. A thriving industry of Youtube reaction channels hinges on that plausibility. It’s just the concept of the OP’s headline implying it’s a generational thing when it definitely isn’t.