• WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Nominally give each new state a proportional share of the weapons. In reality, the states will quickly come back together into one or a handful of new countries. Nuclear weapons are incredibly expensive to maintain. A newly independent North Dakota will not be able to maintain the weapons that are assigned to it. They’ll quickly trade them as bargaining chips in negotiations with some larger state.

    It’s important to consider the alternative to dissolution. We are no longer capable of solving real problems. The currency and economy are already doomed, as we’re not going to be able to put our fiscal house in order before the debt collapses everything.

    A major economic upheaval is already locked in, assured by our irreparable political system. Better to just admit it now and dissolve the country peacefully. The alternative is we have a series of bloody and ruinous civil wars as states try to break away one by one from the dying empire.

    • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      17 hours ago

      They’ll quickly trade them as bargaining chips in negotiations with some larger state.

      Full stop. If part of your solution is selling nuclear weapons to whoever pays the most to cover your bills your plan is already shit.