Things didn’t end well for the last guy…

    • GiantChickDicks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Okay, I don’t agree with the emotional concept that a fetus is a person innately, but I can at least understand where that type of thinking comes from. Claiming it’s a fully-developed human is just demonstrably wrong. You’re entitled to your opinion, but feelings aren’t facts. I sincerely hope this is a sad attempt at trolling.

        • medgremlin@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          21 days ago

          What is your solution for fetal anomalies that will inevitably lead to stillbirth or death in the first few hours of life? What is your solution for pregnancy abnormalities that put the life of the mother at serious risk? What is your solution for women who are desperately trying to escape monstrously abusive relationships that got pregnant from marital rape or coercion?

            • medgremlin@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              20 days ago

              Screening means termination of non viable fetuses or carrying to stillbirth. Gene therapy is only available for one disease in humans and it isn’t a fetal anomaly. There are malformations that are not compatible with life that are random chance and not something you can predict through genetic analysis.

              In America, the leading cause of death of pregnant women is intimate partner homicide. The 2 most lethal times in an abusive relationship are when the victim is trying to leave or the victim is pregnant.

              Many women are pressured or coerced into unprotected sex by male partners and most courts wouldn’t prosecute those cases as rape because the woman eventually “consented” under browbeating and duress.

              The majority of abortions are sought by women who already have children and are not able to afford or to care for another child and the pregnancy was unplanned. Many other abortions are for serious health problems with the mother or the fetus. Functionally no one is getting abortions as birth control or “recreationally”. It is an unpleasant procedure and women who go through with it do so for important, valid reasons, and your beliefs have no place getting between a woman and the physician caring for her.

        • nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 days ago

          Do you believe people who are unresponsive and comatose for a long period should be kept alive despite the families wishes?

    • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 days ago

      A fetus is objectively not fully formed. What do you think its doing in the womb for all those months, just hanging out? When abortions happen its just a bundle of cells that cant think, breathe, or live on its own.

        • moonlight@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          21 days ago

          A coma involves brain activity in a highly developed nervous system, often with a high chance of recovery.

          A fetus has a tiny, undeveloped nervous system, with no higher brain functions.

          These are not at all equivalent. One is a person, and the other is not.

        • Kalysta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 days ago

          Cancer

          Cancer is a bunch of cells. By your logic it is immoral to treat cancer. Cancer has human DNA. Cancer can also live independent of the human that spawned it.

          We should stop killing cancer too.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 days ago

      Then how come they can’t survive without leeching off a host? 80% of pregnancies spontaneously end in miscarriage. That doesn’t sound viable or fully developed to me. If it could survive outside the womb, you’d have a point. But it can’t, so you don’t.

      You know who was actually fully-developed? All the women who have died due to pregnancy complications thanks to draconic laws that take away their rights over their own bodies. I’ll hold you responsible for murdering them.

      • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        21 days ago

        You clearly don’t know biology do you & are you capable of sustaining yourself I you were left in a jungle ? BTW, it’s around 13.5 percent but regardless it’s not 80% (that’s a lie)

        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2020)
        • National Center for Health Statistics. (1999). Trends in Pregnancies and Pregnancy Rates.
        • JAMA Network. (2020)

        I hold you responsible for the billions of deaths of unborn children, because of your stupidity & selfishness & inhumanity

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          You clearly don’t know biology do you

          Says the person claiming a fetus is a fully developed human.

          are you capable of sustaining yourself I you were left in a jungle ?

          Millions of people live in the jungles of the world. How many fetuses live outside wombs? Oh right, none. Because there’s a difference between having the skills to survive in the jungle, and being a fully developed human capable of independent biological survival.

          Have you ensured that every single one of your gametes resulted in a child? Then you’re a genocidal hypocrite.

        • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          BTW, it’s around 13.5 percent but regardless it’s not 80% (that’s a lie)

          Sure, if you only measure after 6 weeks.

          For women of reproductive age, losses between implantation and clinical recognition are approximately 10–25%. Loss from implantation to birth is approximately one third [39, 46, 48, 49].

          A recent re-analysis [39] of data from three studies [46, 48, 49] concluded that, in normal healthy women, 10–40% is a plausible range for pre-implantation embryo loss and overall pregnancy loss from fertilisation to birth is approximately 40–60%.

          https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5443340/

    • Kalysta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      No. A fully developed human would be post-pubescent. Until then you are either a fetus incapable of living outside your mother’s body, or a baby capable of independent life with some sort of care.

      Fetuses are NOT babies. Stop being obtuse.