If the court ended up forcing Google to sell Android, shouldn’t we worry that its license as an open source project could be removed and then it become proprietary?

  • Zachariah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Any part that is already open source will eternally be open source. Furthermore, there are rules about using open source code in projects that requires them to also be open source.

    • Atemu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is entirely untrue.

      Any part that is already open source will eternally be open source.

      Only in the state that it is right now. Google could at any point simply stop releasing the source code with no warning and make all further modifications proprietary.

      there are rules about using open source code in projects that requires them to also be open source.

      That is only true for copyleft licenses. Licenses that are merely “open source” (also called “permissive”) such as the Apache License 2.0 which the AOSP is licensed under do not give two hoots about what you do with the code as long as you give appropriate credit.

      The only part of Android that has a copyleft license is the Linux kernel (GPLv2) and I wouldn’t really consider it part of the AOSP in practice.

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    i think it would probably go the other way. google has closed down so much of the android core system that they would probably respond to the court by opening those parts back up.

    • Atemu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Google is only going to “respond” by doing things it’s explicitly ordered to comply with and of course extremely reluctantly; only doing the bare minimum that could be seen as complying.

      They sure as hell aren’t going to open up the google surveillance services unless explicitly and specifically forced to do so by a court.